From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58091)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tom.ty89@gmail.com>) id 1aybxd-0005C7-AM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 05:22:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tom.ty89@gmail.com>) id 1aybxR-0006xt-OS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 05:22:07 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22c]:34503)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tom.ty89@gmail.com>) id 1aybxQ-0006qS-Ho
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 05:22:01 -0400
Received: by mail-yw0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id j74so170030998ywg.1
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 06 May 2016 02:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGnHSEn=iPBLo15gHLwmMyN894wwjcOOQjDPi88U1vZcdsMvtQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGnHSE=9LHerSg7mauPG-uXTkH=dZidnzSu13LNjeK0F18J8jA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGnHSEn=iPBLo15gHLwmMyN894wwjcOOQjDPi88U1vZcdsMvtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 17:21:42 +0800
Message-ID: <CAGnHSEmj_h-D_RTS45jLH2rf8-KH32cei2nWfB7OVWrGqnTTwQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] seabios does not support booting from usb-uas with
 nec-usb-xhci
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Sorry, I forgot to mention that I am using qemu 2.5.1 and seabios 1.9.2.

On 6 May 2016 at 17:04, Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 17:00, Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This makes me wonder if it is just a missing feature of a bug.
>>
>
> I meant "or" instead of "of".