* [RESEND] target/riscv: fix RV128 lq encoding
@ 2022-01-18 16:32 Christoph Muellner
2022-01-19 19:44 ` Frédéric Pétrot
2022-01-19 20:04 ` Philipp Tomsich
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Muellner @ 2022-01-18 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis, Bin Meng, qemu-riscv,
qemu-devel, Philipp Tomsich
Cc: Christoph Muellner
If LQ has func3==010 and is located in the MISC-MEM opcodes,
then it conflicts with the CBO opcode space.
However, since LQ is specified as: "LQ is added to the MISC-MEM major
opcode", we have an implementation bug, because 'major opcode'
refers to func3, which must be 111.
This results in the following instruction encodings:
lq ........ ........ .111.... .0001111
cbo_clean 00000000 0001.... .0100000 00001111
cbo_flush 00000000 0010.... .0100000 00001111
cbo_inval 00000000 0000.... .0100000 00001111
cbo_zero 00000000 0100.... .0100000 00001111
^^^-func3
^^^^^^^-opcode
Signed-off-by: Christoph Muellner <cmuellner@linux.com>
---
target/riscv/insn32.decode | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/insn32.decode b/target/riscv/insn32.decode
index 5bbedc254c..d3f798ca10 100644
--- a/target/riscv/insn32.decode
+++ b/target/riscv/insn32.decode
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ sraw 0100000 ..... ..... 101 ..... 0111011 @r
# *** RV128I Base Instruction Set (in addition to RV64I) ***
ldu ............ ..... 111 ..... 0000011 @i
-lq ............ ..... 010 ..... 0001111 @i
+lq ............ ..... 111 ..... 0001111 @i
sq ............ ..... 100 ..... 0100011 @s
addid ............ ..... 000 ..... 1011011 @i
sllid 000000 ...... ..... 001 ..... 1011011 @sh6
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND] target/riscv: fix RV128 lq encoding
2022-01-18 16:32 [RESEND] target/riscv: fix RV128 lq encoding Christoph Muellner
@ 2022-01-19 19:44 ` Frédéric Pétrot
2022-01-20 10:57 ` Christoph Müllner
2022-01-19 20:04 ` Philipp Tomsich
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Frédéric Pétrot @ 2022-01-19 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Muellner, Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis, Bin Meng,
qemu-riscv, qemu-devel, Philipp Tomsich
Le 18/01/2022 à 17:32, Christoph Muellner a écrit :
> If LQ has func3==010 and is located in the MISC-MEM opcodes,
> then it conflicts with the CBO opcode space.
> However, since LQ is specified as: "LQ is added to the MISC-MEM major
> opcode", we have an implementation bug, because 'major opcode'
> refers to func3, which must be 111.
>
> This results in the following instruction encodings:
>
> lq ........ ........ .111.... .0001111
> cbo_clean 00000000 0001.... .0100000 00001111
> cbo_flush 00000000 0010.... .0100000 00001111
> cbo_inval 00000000 0000.... .0100000 00001111
> cbo_zero 00000000 0100.... .0100000 00001111
> ^^^-func3
> ^^^^^^^-opcode
Hello Christoph,
I see page table 26.1 of the last riscv-isa-manual.pdf what is called major
opcodes in my understanding, and MISC-MEM is one of them with value 00_111_11.
The value for func3 that I chose comes from
https://github.com/michaeljclark/riscv-meta/blob/master/opcodes
which admittedly is out-dated, but I don't see any particular value for
LQ/SQ in the new spec either (I mean, riscv-isa-manual.pdf, any pointer we
could refer to ?).
I have nothing against changing the opcode, but then we need to change
disas/riscv.c which also uses the previous opcode to dump instructions when
running with -d in_asm.
Frédéric
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Muellner <cmuellner@linux.com>
> ---
> target/riscv/insn32.decode | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn32.decode b/target/riscv/insn32.decode
> index 5bbedc254c..d3f798ca10 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/insn32.decode
> +++ b/target/riscv/insn32.decode
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ sraw 0100000 ..... ..... 101 ..... 0111011 @r
>
> # *** RV128I Base Instruction Set (in addition to RV64I) ***
> ldu ............ ..... 111 ..... 0000011 @i
> -lq ............ ..... 010 ..... 0001111 @i
> +lq ............ ..... 111 ..... 0001111 @i
> sq ............ ..... 100 ..... 0100011 @s
> addid ............ ..... 000 ..... 1011011 @i
> sllid 000000 ...... ..... 001 ..... 1011011 @sh6
--
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Frédéric Pétrot, Pr. Grenoble INP-Ensimag/TIMA, Ensimag deputy director |
| Mob/Pho: +33 6 74 57 99 65/+33 4 76 57 48 70 Ad augusta per angusta |
| http://tima.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND] target/riscv: fix RV128 lq encoding
2022-01-18 16:32 [RESEND] target/riscv: fix RV128 lq encoding Christoph Muellner
2022-01-19 19:44 ` Frédéric Pétrot
@ 2022-01-19 20:04 ` Philipp Tomsich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Philipp Tomsich @ 2022-01-19 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Muellner
Cc: Alistair Francis, Bin Meng, Palmer Dabbelt, qemu-riscv,
qemu-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2709 bytes --]
The cbo.* mnemonics share their opcode space with lq for those cases where
rd == 0 ("brownfield" encodings).
"Major opcode" refers to inst[6:0] according to chapter 26.
In overlapping multi-group syntax, this would look like:
> {
>
> # *** RV32 Zicbom Standard Extension ***
>
> cbo_clean 0000000 00001 ..... 010 00000 0001111 @sfence_vm
>
> cbo_flush 0000000 00010 ..... 010 00000 0001111 @sfence_vm
>
> cbo_inval 0000000 00000 ..... 010 00000 0001111 @sfence_vm
>
>
> # *** RV32 Zicboz Standard Extension ***
>
> cbo_zero 0000000 00100 ..... 010 00000 0001111 @sfence_vm
>
>
> # *** RVI128 lq ***
>
> lq ............ ..... 010 ..... 0001111 @i
>
> }
>
Instead of using a multigroup here, I would recommend that you take a look
at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=605340
where we have added a table of optional decoders — this could be used to
split these off into separate decoders that are run before the regular
decoder, if & only if Zicboc and/or Zicboz are enabled.
Cheers,
Philipp.
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 17:32, Christoph Muellner <cmuellner@linux.com>
wrote:
> If LQ has func3==010 and is located in the MISC-MEM opcodes,
> then it conflicts with the CBO opcode space.
> However, since LQ is specified as: "LQ is added to the MISC-MEM major
> opcode", we have an implementation bug, because 'major opcode'
> refers to func3, which must be 111.
>
> This results in the following instruction encodings:
>
> lq ........ ........ .111.... .0001111
> cbo_clean 00000000 0001.... .0100000 00001111
> cbo_flush 00000000 0010.... .0100000 00001111
> cbo_inval 00000000 0000.... .0100000 00001111
> cbo_zero 00000000 0100.... .0100000 00001111
> ^^^-func3
> ^^^^^^^-opcode
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Muellner <cmuellner@linux.com>
> ---
> target/riscv/insn32.decode | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn32.decode b/target/riscv/insn32.decode
> index 5bbedc254c..d3f798ca10 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/insn32.decode
> +++ b/target/riscv/insn32.decode
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ sraw 0100000 ..... ..... 101 ..... 0111011 @r
>
> # *** RV128I Base Instruction Set (in addition to RV64I) ***
> ldu ............ ..... 111 ..... 0000011 @i
> -lq ............ ..... 010 ..... 0001111 @i
> +lq ............ ..... 111 ..... 0001111 @i
> sq ............ ..... 100 ..... 0100011 @s
> addid ............ ..... 000 ..... 1011011 @i
> sllid 000000 ...... ..... 001 ..... 1011011 @sh6
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7593 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND] target/riscv: fix RV128 lq encoding
2022-01-19 19:44 ` Frédéric Pétrot
@ 2022-01-20 10:57 ` Christoph Müllner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Müllner @ 2022-01-20 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frédéric Pétrot
Cc: qemu-riscv, Bin Meng, qemu-devel, Philipp Tomsich,
Alistair Francis, Palmer Dabbelt
Hi Frédéric,
you are right, I misunderstood the "LQ is added to the MISC-MEM major
opcode" part of the spec.
I saw the encoding conflict with the CBO instructions and thought of a
bug in qemu's LQ encoding.
Philipp already highlighted that cbo.* instructions are actually LQ with rd=0.
Thanks,
Christoph
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:45 PM Frédéric Pétrot
<frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote:
>
> Le 18/01/2022 à 17:32, Christoph Muellner a écrit :
> > If LQ has func3==010 and is located in the MISC-MEM opcodes,
> > then it conflicts with the CBO opcode space.
> > However, since LQ is specified as: "LQ is added to the MISC-MEM major
> > opcode", we have an implementation bug, because 'major opcode'
> > refers to func3, which must be 111.
> >
> > This results in the following instruction encodings:
> >
> > lq ........ ........ .111.... .0001111
> > cbo_clean 00000000 0001.... .0100000 00001111
> > cbo_flush 00000000 0010.... .0100000 00001111
> > cbo_inval 00000000 0000.... .0100000 00001111
> > cbo_zero 00000000 0100.... .0100000 00001111
> > ^^^-func3
> > ^^^^^^^-opcode
>
> Hello Christoph,
> I see page table 26.1 of the last riscv-isa-manual.pdf what is called major
> opcodes in my understanding, and MISC-MEM is one of them with value 00_111_11.
> The value for func3 that I chose comes from
> https://github.com/michaeljclark/riscv-meta/blob/master/opcodes
> which admittedly is out-dated, but I don't see any particular value for
> LQ/SQ in the new spec either (I mean, riscv-isa-manual.pdf, any pointer we
> could refer to ?).
> I have nothing against changing the opcode, but then we need to change
> disas/riscv.c which also uses the previous opcode to dump instructions when
> running with -d in_asm.
>
> Frédéric
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Muellner <cmuellner@linux.com>
> > ---
> > target/riscv/insn32.decode | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/insn32.decode b/target/riscv/insn32.decode
> > index 5bbedc254c..d3f798ca10 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/insn32.decode
> > +++ b/target/riscv/insn32.decode
> > @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ sraw 0100000 ..... ..... 101 ..... 0111011 @r
> >
> > # *** RV128I Base Instruction Set (in addition to RV64I) ***
> > ldu ............ ..... 111 ..... 0000011 @i
> > -lq ............ ..... 010 ..... 0001111 @i
> > +lq ............ ..... 111 ..... 0001111 @i
> > sq ............ ..... 100 ..... 0100011 @s
> > addid ............ ..... 000 ..... 1011011 @i
> > sllid 000000 ...... ..... 001 ..... 1011011 @sh6
>
> --
> +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Frédéric Pétrot, Pr. Grenoble INP-Ensimag/TIMA, Ensimag deputy director |
> | Mob/Pho: +33 6 74 57 99 65/+33 4 76 57 48 70 Ad augusta per angusta |
> | http://tima.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr |
> +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-20 12:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-18 16:32 [RESEND] target/riscv: fix RV128 lq encoding Christoph Muellner
2022-01-19 19:44 ` Frédéric Pétrot
2022-01-20 10:57 ` Christoph Müllner
2022-01-19 20:04 ` Philipp Tomsich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).