From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37271) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gczjg-0007R8-3M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:32:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gczU2-0005tp-LD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:15:55 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::430]:45121) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gczU2-0005sH-59 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:15:54 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id t6so21927665wrr.12 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 13:15:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <945511ac-d99a-d483-12a2-e6ad4dda09c2@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 21:15:41 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] AVX support for TCG List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Nick Renieris Cc: Richard Henderson , QEMU Developers On Fri, 28 Dec 2018, 13:46 Nick Renieris > Another question, are there existing discussions about this > refactoring effort or specifically AVX? I asked a similar question on > IRC a few days ago and got no answers. > You might want to try again next week. Most QEMU hackers are away for the holidays and also tend to be on IRC during working hours. >