From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48917) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQLFY-0002Az-Bq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 12:21:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQLFW-00013B-L3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 12:20:55 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com ([209.85.217.173]:35510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQLFW-000132-9o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 12:20:54 -0400 Received: by lbok6 with SMTP id k6so2633231lbo.4 for ; Fri, 04 May 2012 09:20:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paolo.bonzini@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <1334232076-19018-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> References: <1334232076-19018-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 18:20:31 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/26] My block patches queue for 1.1 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Here is my block patches queue for 1.1. > > Patches 1-6 are cleanups to tools and aio.c that let filesystems > use timers when running under qemu-io. > > Patches 7-12 are bugfixes from last week's series, patches 13-14 > are new. > > Patches 15-19 are fixes to qemu-io and qemu-iotests. > > Patches 20-22 are fixes to streaming. =A0Patch 22 modifies it to > not stream unallocated areas of the base (see rationale in the > commit message). =A0For this reason I'm including in this series > also patch 23, which implements is_allocated for raw-posix. > > Finally, patches 24-26 are small changes to streaming that move > some code outside block/stream.c for more general usage. Kevin, what should I do about these patches? It needs rebasing, but there are several bugfixes in here, and there are more that I need to submit. Some ideas about what I could do to help: - split it in chunks, and see where we get by the time of 1.1 (risk of not finding problems in late patches) - find patches that are in RHEL, prod RHEL reviewers for a Reviewed-by. ... Paolo