From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44951) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fD9Wz-0003YB-So for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:11:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fD9Wv-0002DZ-Tn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:11:53 -0400 Received: from outprodmail02.cc.columbia.edu ([128.59.72.51]:33484) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fD9Wv-00028m-P8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:11:49 -0400 Received: from hazelnut (hazelnut.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.213.250]) by outprodmail02.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w3UE8Y9i023530 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:11:43 -0400 Received: from hazelnut (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hazelnut (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7D17E for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:11:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sendprodmail02.cc.columbia.edu (sendprodmail02.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.72.14]) by hazelnut (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F6880 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:11:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-wm0-f69.google.com (mail-wm0-f69.google.com [74.125.82.69]) by sendprodmail02.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w3UEBgxo050851 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:11:43 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f69.google.com with SMTP id 70so3092816wmb.2 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 07:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com. [74.125.82.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q6-v6sm4480716edb.66.2018.04.30.07.11.40 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Apr 2018 07:11:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id i3so14418434wmf.3 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 07:11:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jintack Lim Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:11:39 -0400 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: [Qemu-devel] How to check if Vt-d is capable of posted-interrupt? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: QEMU Devel Mailing List , KVM General Hi, I wonder how to check if Vt-d is capable of posted-interrupt? I'm using Intel E5-2630 v3. I was once told that APICv and posted-interrupt capability always come together. But it seems like my cpu support APICv (/sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/enable_apicv is Y), but posted-interrupt capability is only shipped with the next generation of the cpu (E5-2600 v4, which is Broadwell). What would be an easy way to check this? Thanks, Jintack