qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com>
To: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Cc: Peter Turschmid <peter.turschm@nutanix.com>,
	Raphael Norwitz <raphael.s.norwitz@gmail.com>,
	QEMU <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] Lift max memory slots limit imposed by vhost-user
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:45:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ+F1CLH7rG_iCNKM7-3ntrHiQECjcnaxbOui3vZ+oWvckE43Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1588533678-23450-6-git-send-email-raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10515 bytes --]

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 7:00 AM Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
wrote:

> Historically, sending all memory regions to vhost-user backends in a
> single message imposed a limitation on the number of times memory
> could be hot-added to a VM with a vhost-user device. Now that backends
> which support the VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CONFIGURE_SLOTS send memory
> regions individually, we no longer need to impose this limitation on
> devices which support this feature.
>
> With this change, VMs with a vhost-user device which supports the
> VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CONFIGURE_MEM_SLOTS can support a configurable
> number of memory slots, up to the maximum allowed by the target
> platform.
>
> Existing backends which do not support
> VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CONFIGURE_MEM_SLOTS are unaffected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Turschmid <peter.turschm@nutanix.com>
> Suggested-by: Mike Cui <cui@nutanix.com>
>

Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>

---
>  docs/interop/vhost-user.rst |  7 +++---
>  hw/virtio/vhost-user.c      | 56
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/interop/vhost-user.rst b/docs/interop/vhost-user.rst
> index 037eefa..688b7c6 100644
> --- a/docs/interop/vhost-user.rst
> +++ b/docs/interop/vhost-user.rst
> @@ -1273,10 +1273,9 @@ Master message types
>    feature has been successfully negotiated, this message is submitted
>    by master to the slave. The slave should return the message with a
>    u64 payload containing the maximum number of memory slots for
> -  QEMU to expose to the guest. At this point, the value returned
> -  by the backend will be capped at the maximum number of ram slots
> -  which can be supported by vhost-user. Currently that limit is set
> -  at VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS = 8.
> +  QEMU to expose to the guest. The value returned by the backend
> +  will be capped at the maximum number of ram slots which can be
> +  supported by the target platform.
>
>  ``VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG``
>    :id: 37
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> index 9358406..48b8081 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> @@ -35,11 +35,29 @@
>  #include <linux/userfaultfd.h>
>  #endif
>
> -#define VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS    8
> +#define VHOST_MEMORY_BASELINE_NREGIONS    8
>  #define VHOST_USER_F_PROTOCOL_FEATURES 30
>  #define VHOST_USER_SLAVE_MAX_FDS     8
>
>  /*
> + * Set maximum number of RAM slots supported to
> + * the maximum number supported by the target
> + * hardware plaform.
> + */
> +#if defined(TARGET_X86) || defined(TARGET_X86_64) || \
> +    defined(TARGET_ARM) || defined(TARGET_ARM_64)
> +#include "hw/acpi/acpi.h"
> +#define VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS ACPI_MAX_RAM_SLOTS
> +
> +#elif defined(TARGET_PPC) || defined(TARGET_PPC_64)
> +#include "hw/ppc/spapr.h"
> +#define VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS SPAPR_MAX_RAM_SLOTS
> +
> +#else
> +#define VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS 512
> +#endif
> +
> +/*
>   * Maximum size of virtio device config space
>   */
>  #define VHOST_USER_MAX_CONFIG_SIZE 256
> @@ -127,7 +145,7 @@ typedef struct VhostUserMemoryRegion {
>  typedef struct VhostUserMemory {
>      uint32_t nregions;
>      uint32_t padding;
> -    VhostUserMemoryRegion regions[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
> +    VhostUserMemoryRegion regions[VHOST_MEMORY_BASELINE_NREGIONS];
>  } VhostUserMemory;
>
>  typedef struct VhostUserMemRegMsg {
> @@ -222,7 +240,7 @@ struct vhost_user {
>      int slave_fd;
>      NotifierWithReturn postcopy_notifier;
>      struct PostCopyFD  postcopy_fd;
> -    uint64_t           postcopy_client_bases[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
> +    uint64_t           postcopy_client_bases[VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS];
>      /* Length of the region_rb and region_rb_offset arrays */
>      size_t             region_rb_len;
>      /* RAMBlock associated with a given region */
> @@ -237,7 +255,7 @@ struct vhost_user {
>
>      /* Our current regions */
>      int num_shadow_regions;
> -    struct vhost_memory_region shadow_regions[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
> +    struct vhost_memory_region shadow_regions[VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS];
>  };
>
>  struct scrub_regions {
> @@ -392,7 +410,7 @@ int vhost_user_gpu_set_socket(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> int fd)
>  static int vhost_user_set_log_base(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint64_t base,
>                                     struct vhost_log *log)
>  {
> -    int fds[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
> +    int fds[VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS];
>      size_t fd_num = 0;
>      bool shmfd = virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features,
>                                      VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_LOG_SHMFD);
> @@ -470,7 +488,7 @@ static int vhost_user_fill_set_mem_table_msg(struct
> vhost_user *u,
>          mr = vhost_user_get_mr_data(reg->userspace_addr, &offset, &fd);
>          if (fd > 0) {
>              if (track_ramblocks) {
> -                assert(*fd_num < VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS);
> +                assert(*fd_num < VHOST_MEMORY_BASELINE_NREGIONS);
>                  trace_vhost_user_set_mem_table_withfd(*fd_num, mr->name,
>                                                        reg->memory_size,
>
>  reg->guest_phys_addr,
> @@ -478,7 +496,7 @@ static int vhost_user_fill_set_mem_table_msg(struct
> vhost_user *u,
>                                                        offset);
>                  u->region_rb_offset[i] = offset;
>                  u->region_rb[i] = mr->ram_block;
> -            } else if (*fd_num == VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS) {
> +            } else if (*fd_num == VHOST_MEMORY_BASELINE_NREGIONS) {
>                  error_report("Failed preparing vhost-user memory table
> msg");
>                  return -1;
>              }
> @@ -523,7 +541,7 @@ static void scrub_shadow_regions(struct vhost_dev *dev,
>                                   bool track_ramblocks)
>  {
>      struct vhost_user *u = dev->opaque;
> -    bool found[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS] = {};
> +    bool found[VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS] = {};
>      struct vhost_memory_region *reg, *shadow_reg;
>      int i, j, fd, add_idx = 0, rm_idx = 0, fd_num = 0;
>      ram_addr_t offset;
> @@ -777,9 +795,9 @@ static int vhost_user_add_remove_regions(struct
> vhost_dev *dev,
>                                           bool track_ramblocks)
>  {
>      struct vhost_user *u = dev->opaque;
> -    struct scrub_regions add_reg[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
> -    struct scrub_regions rem_reg[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
> -    uint64_t shadow_pcb[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS] = {};
> +    struct scrub_regions add_reg[VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS];
> +    struct scrub_regions rem_reg[VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS];
> +    uint64_t shadow_pcb[VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS] = {};
>      int nr_add_reg, nr_rem_reg;
>
>      msg->hdr.size = sizeof(msg->payload.mem_reg.padding) +
> @@ -803,7 +821,7 @@ static int vhost_user_add_remove_regions(struct
> vhost_dev *dev,
>
>      if (track_ramblocks) {
>          memcpy(u->postcopy_client_bases, shadow_pcb,
> -               sizeof(uint64_t) * VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS);
> +               sizeof(uint64_t) * VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS);
>          /*
>           * Now we've registered this with the postcopy code, we ack to the
>           * client, because now we're in the position to be able to deal
> with
> @@ -823,7 +841,7 @@ static int vhost_user_add_remove_regions(struct
> vhost_dev *dev,
>  err:
>      if (track_ramblocks) {
>          memcpy(u->postcopy_client_bases, shadow_pcb,
> -               sizeof(uint64_t) * VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS);
> +               sizeof(uint64_t) * VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS);
>      }
>
>      return -1;
> @@ -835,7 +853,7 @@ static int vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy(struct
> vhost_dev *dev,
>                                               bool config_mem_slots)
>  {
>      struct vhost_user *u = dev->opaque;
> -    int fds[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
> +    int fds[VHOST_MEMORY_BASELINE_NREGIONS];
>      size_t fd_num = 0;
>      VhostUserMsg msg_reply;
>      int region_i, msg_i;
> @@ -893,7 +911,7 @@ static int vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy(struct
> vhost_dev *dev,
>          }
>
>          memset(u->postcopy_client_bases, 0,
> -               sizeof(uint64_t) * VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS);
> +               sizeof(uint64_t) * VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS);
>
>          /*
>           * They're in the same order as the regions that were sent
> @@ -942,7 +960,7 @@ static int vhost_user_set_mem_table(struct vhost_dev
> *dev,
>                                      struct vhost_memory *mem)
>  {
>      struct vhost_user *u = dev->opaque;
> -    int fds[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
> +    int fds[VHOST_MEMORY_BASELINE_NREGIONS];
>      size_t fd_num = 0;
>      bool do_postcopy = u->postcopy_listen && u->postcopy_fd.handler;
>      bool reply_supported = virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features,
> @@ -1149,7 +1167,7 @@ static int vhost_set_vring_file(struct vhost_dev
> *dev,
>                                  VhostUserRequest request,
>                                  struct vhost_vring_file *file)
>  {
> -    int fds[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
> +    int fds[VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS];
>      size_t fd_num = 0;
>      VhostUserMsg msg = {
>          .hdr.request = request,
> @@ -1845,7 +1863,7 @@ static int vhost_user_backend_init(struct vhost_dev
> *dev, void *opaque)
>          /* get max memory regions if backend supports configurable RAM
> slots */
>          if (!virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features,
>
>  VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CONFIGURE_MEM_SLOTS)) {
> -            u->user->memory_slots = VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS;
> +            u->user->memory_slots = VHOST_MEMORY_BASELINE_NREGIONS;
>          } else {
>              err = vhost_user_get_max_memslots(dev, &ram_slots);
>              if (err < 0) {
> @@ -1860,7 +1878,7 @@ static int vhost_user_backend_init(struct vhost_dev
> *dev, void *opaque)
>                  return -1;
>              }
>
> -            u->user->memory_slots = MIN(ram_slots,
> VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS);
> +            u->user->memory_slots = MIN(ram_slots,
> VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS);
>          }
>      }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>

-- 
Marc-André Lureau

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12719 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-04 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-21  5:00 [PATCH v4 00/10] vhost-user: Lift Max Ram Slots Limitation Raphael Norwitz
2020-05-21  5:00 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] Add helper to populate vhost-user message regions Raphael Norwitz
2020-06-04 14:40   ` Marc-André Lureau
2020-05-21  5:00 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] Add vhost-user helper to get MemoryRegion data Raphael Norwitz
2020-06-04 14:41   ` Marc-André Lureau
2020-05-21  5:00 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] Add VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CONFIGURE_MEM_SLOTS Raphael Norwitz
2020-06-04 14:42   ` Marc-André Lureau
2020-05-21  5:00 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] Transmit vhost-user memory regions individually Raphael Norwitz
2020-06-04 14:44   ` Marc-André Lureau
2020-06-09 14:13     ` Raphael Norwitz
2020-05-21  5:00 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] Lift max memory slots limit imposed by vhost-user Raphael Norwitz
2020-06-04 14:45   ` Marc-André Lureau [this message]
2020-05-21  5:00 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] Refactor out libvhost-user fault generation logic Raphael Norwitz
2020-06-04 14:48   ` Marc-André Lureau
2020-05-21  5:00 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] Support ram slot configuration in libvhost-user Raphael Norwitz
2020-06-04 14:49   ` Marc-André Lureau
2020-05-21  5:00 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] Support adding individual regions " Raphael Norwitz
2020-05-21  5:00 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] Support individual region unmap " Raphael Norwitz
2020-05-21  5:00 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] Lift max ram slots limit " Raphael Norwitz
2020-06-04  4:11 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] vhost-user: Lift Max Ram Slots Limitation Raphael Norwitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJ+F1CLH7rG_iCNKM7-3ntrHiQECjcnaxbOui3vZ+oWvckE43Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=marcandre.lureau@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.turschm@nutanix.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com \
    --cc=raphael.s.norwitz@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).