From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55095) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpIGa-0007oL-AY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:59:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpIGZ-0001W0-Jr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:59:00 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::244]:32932) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpIGZ-0001Ve-F6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:58:59 -0400 Received: by iodv82 with SMTP id v82so9310765iod.0 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:58:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1445455227.4059.867.camel@redhat.com> References: <1445445464-5056-1-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com> <1445455227.4059.867.camel@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:58:58 +0300 Message-ID: From: Or Gerlitz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 00/12] IXGBE: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex Williamson Cc: emil.s.tantilov@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin (mst@redhat.com)" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jesse Brandeburg , carolyn.wyborny@intel.com, "Skidmore, Donald C" , Alexander Graf , matthew.vick@intel.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Jeff Kirsher , yang.z.zhang@intel.com, Mitch Williams , nrupal.jani@intel.com, Bjorn Helgaas , Lan Tianyu , Linux Netdev List , Shannon Nelson , eddie.dong@intel.com, Linux Kernel , john.ronciak@intel.com, Paolo Bonzini On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > This is why the typical VF agnostic approach here is to using bonding > and fail over to a emulated device during migration, so performance > suffers, but downtime is something acceptable. bonding in the VM isn't a zero touch solution, right? is it really acceptable?