From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40783) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxIjD-0003Oe-MC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:47:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxIj8-0003ar-Ml for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:47:31 -0500 Received: from mail-tul01m020-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:55504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxIj8-0003aQ-Gy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:47:26 -0500 Received: by obbup16 with SMTP id up16so10131510obb.4 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:47:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: anthony.perard@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <4F3A6C010200007800072E67@nat28.tlf.novell.com> References: <1329135613-26061-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> <1329135613-26061-11-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> <4F3A6C010200007800072E67@nat28.tlf.novell.com> From: Anthony PERARD Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:46:55 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH V6 10/11] Introduce Xen PCI Passthrough, MSI (3/3) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Beulich Cc: Xen Devel , Shan Haitao , QEMU-devel , Stefano Stabellini On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 13:13, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 13.02.12 at 13:20, Anthony PERARD wrote: >> From: Jiang Yunhong >> >> A more complete history can be found here: >> git://xenbits.xensource.com/qemu-xen-unstable.git > > This needs to be updated to include the changes in > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=qemu-xen-unstable.git;a=commitdiff;h=bb36d632e4cabf47882adff07a45c6702c4a5b30 > (and hopefully the broken function that got fixed in > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=qemu-xen-unstable.git;a=commitdiff;h=8cc8a3651c9c5bc2d0086d12f4b870fc525b9387 > didn't even make it into this patch set). For the first patch/link, the 'volatile' variable should already be in the patch (without a separate patch :( ). For the second, yes, unregister_iomem is done by other functions in QEMU. > In particular it must be avoided > to map the MSI-X table with PROT_WRITE, and the respective MMIO > range should not get assigned to the guest at all. I will check that. Regards, -- Anthony PERARD