qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Sergio Lopez" <slp@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Oleinik, Alexander" <alxndr@bu.edu>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Dave Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Why QEMU should move from C to Rust (clickbait alert ;))
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 10:44:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJSP0QUfET+KjAaUS6ped=OWh0ZFN1Kup1jAvGw4Cr3M2eDa8w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200806110826.GH4159383@redhat.com>

On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:08 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> Yes, but I think we'll need put in significant effort to guide / assist
> people in taking this direction, and think about what it means for the
> future of QEMU as a brand and GIT repo.
>
> In many ways it is a good thing if the Rust vhost-user impls are
> all in their own standalone git repos. They're likely to be independent
> codebases, so there's little compelling reason to force them into the
> QEMU git, where they'll have to use QEMU workflow, and QEMU release
> cycle. They're better off free from QEMU where they can choose to adopt
> modern development practices like GitLab merge requests if they
> desire and release on a more frequent cycle than QEMU's 3-times a
> year, etc. Would also make them more appealing for use by alternative
> non-QEMU userspaces for KVM.
>
> The downside is that QEMU git would only contain the "legacy" builtin
> C impls of the devices, and all the "recommended" modern Rust impls
> would be elsewhere. Essentially QEMU would no longer be a self-contained
> provider of the complete solution. Many parts would be disaggregated,
> and users now have the burden of finding all the right pieces to build
> the best solution. We've already seen this to some extent with existing
> vhost-user impls, but it feels like we'd be pushing towards that as a
> more general model for the future which would amplify problems we've
> largely been able to ignore upto now.
>
> I'm not sure what a good answer here is. Perhaps QEMU could try to
> become more of brand for an umbrella project that covers multiple
> independant repos ? eg create new repos under gitlab.com/qemu-project/
> but allow them to work fairly independantly from the main qemu.git ?
> That way we can more easily promote a collection of QEMU repos as
> showing the recommended architecture, without forcing everything
> into qemu.git. We can leverage the QEMU website, wiki and documentation
> in general to showcase the overall solution, while still letting the
> pieces develop independently.

I agree.

Working independently and following Rust conventions ought to work
well for external programs like vhost-user device backends.

It's important that the QEMU source tree builds a complete system. Git
submodules can help with that and are already widely used today.

Stefan


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-07  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-06 10:24 Why QEMU should move from C to Rust (clickbait alert ;)) Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-08-06 11:08 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-08-06 13:39   ` Alex Bennée
2020-08-07  9:28     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-08-07  9:44   ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2020-08-06 11:51 ` Sergio Lopez
2020-08-06 12:01   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-08-06 13:38     ` Sergio Lopez
2020-08-06 13:43       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-08-07  9:27       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-08-07  9:45         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-08-07  9:39   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-08-21 20:18 Alex Carter
2020-08-27  8:08 ` Sergio Lopez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJSP0QUfET+KjAaUS6ped=OWh0ZFN1Kup1jAvGw4Cr3M2eDa8w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=alxndr@bu.edu \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=slp@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).