qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Bug 899140 <899140@bugs.launchpad.net>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 899140] Re: Problem with Linux Kernel Traffic Control
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:32:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJSP0QUvTK52sRAi0ivvg0SMNUNE1HQQPsBwPVLrWeH=RC_a2A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE8A6FA.8090305@labri.fr>

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Vincent Autefage
<899140@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> I have checked differences between the GIT repository (V0.14.0) and the
> Ubuntu version (V0.14.0) and generated patch diff file.
> The patch contains about 5000 lines...
>
> What's the next step ?

Okay, so when you rebuild the Ubuntu package from source the bug is
not present and the largish diff suggests they have added patches on
top of vanilla 0.14.0.

If the Ubuntu source ships with a number of .diff/.patch files that
get applied during the build then you could manually bisect this.
That means rerunning the Ubuntu build but with only the first half of
the list of patches applied.  If that has the bug then split the
untested patches in half too and continue the test cycle.  If the bug
is not present then split the patches in half and continue testing
until you reach the point where the bug goes from present to fixed.

Stefan

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-14 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-02 12:57 [Qemu-devel] [Bug 899140] [NEW] Problem with Linux Kernel Traffic Control Vincent Autefage
2011-12-02 13:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [Bug 899140] " Vincent Autefage
2011-12-02 13:34   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-02 14:42     ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-03 18:48       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-04 15:54         ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-05  8:26           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-05 10:45             ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-05 11:11               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-05 12:24                 ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-07 10:57                 ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-14 13:36                 ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-14 14:32                   ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2011-12-14 14:27                 ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-14 14:42                 ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-15  8:07                   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-15 15:03                     ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-15 16:09                       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-15 16:12                         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-15 16:48                         ` Vincent Autefage
2011-12-16  8:31                           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-01-29  4:49 ` Henrique Rodrigues
2012-01-30 16:30   ` Vincent Autefage
2012-01-31  4:49 ` Henrique Rodrigues
2012-02-09 19:05 ` Henrique Rodrigues
2012-02-10  9:25   ` Vincent Autefage
2017-02-07 12:47 ` Thomas Huth
2017-04-09  4:17 ` Launchpad Bug Tracker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJSP0QUvTK52sRAi0ivvg0SMNUNE1HQQPsBwPVLrWeH=RC_a2A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=899140@bugs.launchpad.net \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).