From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkudD-00008X-Mj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:05:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkud8-0001iQ-0i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:05:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <440320ce-5bd1-bb3d-fedd-2e2ed00f1f19@redhat.com> References: <20170824153345.2244-1-stefanha@redhat.com> <440320ce-5bd1-bb3d-fedd-2e2ed00f1f19@redhat.com> From: Stefan Hajnoczi Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 17:05:09 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH 0/3] nbd-client: enter read_reply_co during init to avoid crash List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel , Kevin Wolf , Paolo Bonzini , qemu block On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 08/24/2017 10:33 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> See Patch 1 for the segfault fix. Patches 2 & 3 add qemu-iotests coverage. >> >> This is a rare crash that we'll probably only see in testing. It only seems to >> happen with UNIX domain sockets. > > Rare enough that I don't think it is 2.10-rc4 material. I'll review, > and if I don't find anything needing a respin, I'll add it to my NBD > queue for 2.11. Great. This is 2.11 material. Stefan