From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58205) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSrq5-00077u-Pf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:00:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSrq1-0006hP-0u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:00:49 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f45.google.com ([209.85.161.45]:61486) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSrq0-0006gz-OJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:00:44 -0500 Received: by faas14 with SMTP id s14so536285faa.4 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 07:00:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87lir8qkzv.fsf@neno.neno> References: <87aa7pfosp.fsf@neno.neno> <87lir8qkzv.fsf@neno.neno> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:00:43 +0000 Message-ID: From: Stefan Hajnoczi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Novemeber 22 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: quintela@redhat.com Cc: Developers qemu-devel , KVM devel mailing list On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: > Juan Quintela wrote: >> Hi >> >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > > As there is no topic for today, and Anthony just give us reading we > would cancel today call. > > Happy hacking (and reading), Juan. I think Anthony was trying to provide some background for a QEMU/KVM sandboxing discussion in today's call. Let's see who is joining because they may want to discuss sandboxing. Stefan