From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33004) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhlaK-0005Pz-Hv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 12:22:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhlaJ-0004XD-MJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 12:22:08 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:35669) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhlaJ-0004X3-Fb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 12:22:07 -0500 Received: by wgbds1 with SMTP id ds1so24540994wgb.10 for ; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:22:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4F0178D1.9070706@redhat.com> References: <4EFCEC38.3080308@codemonkey.ws> <4F002AC6.7080007@redhat.com> <4F0178D1.9070706@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 17:22:06 +0000 Message-ID: From: Stefan Hajnoczi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21][RFC] postcopy live migration List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dlaor@redhat.com Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, satoshi.itoh@aist.go.jp, t.hirofuchi@aist.go.jp, Juan Quintela , Michael Roth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Orit Wasserman , Isaku Yamahata On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Dor Laor wrote: > At the end of the day, it's performance testing using various scenarios that > can educate us whether post-copy worth the extra complexity over slowing > down the guest on the source. True. It's certainly an interesting patch series to benchmark and evaluate. Stefan