From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>,
libguestfs@redhat.com, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Effect of qemu-img convert -m and -W options
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 17:20:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJSP0QXepBMucAFNSbihp6awkurZ=47fTwgv7UHQ3MRiATGS5w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171116151233.GW2787@redhat.com>
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> Afaik all writes to the same QCOW2 serialize because of the s->lock that
>> is held during the write. So its not suprising that there is no benefit from
>> mutliple threads as long as reading from the RAW file involves no delay.
>> Which is likely due to readahead of the OS.
>
> I guess this would explain it, thanks.
The theory is false for preallocated qcow2 image files. Parallel
writes do occur in block/qcow2.c:qcow2_co_pwritev() if the cluster is
already allocated:
qemu_co_mutex_unlock(&s->lock); <----- parallel!
BLKDBG_EVENT(bs->file, BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO);
trace_qcow2_writev_data(qemu_coroutine_self(),
cluster_offset + offset_in_cluster);
ret = bdrv_co_pwritev(bs->file,
cluster_offset + offset_in_cluster,
cur_bytes, &hd_qiov, 0);
qemu_co_mutex_lock(&s->lock);
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-16 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-15 11:52 [Qemu-devel] Effect of qemu-img convert -m and -W options Richard W.M. Jones
2017-11-16 14:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-16 14:51 ` Peter Lieven
2017-11-16 15:12 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2017-11-16 17:20 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2017-11-16 15:10 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2017-11-16 17:30 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-16 18:00 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2017-11-20 15:57 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJSP0QXepBMucAFNSbihp6awkurZ=47fTwgv7UHQ3MRiATGS5w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=libguestfs@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).