From: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>
To: Jonah Palmer <jonah.palmer@oracle.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com, raphael@enfabrica.net,
kwolf@redhat.com, hreitz@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, fam@euphon.net, stefanha@redhat.com,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, schalla@marvell.com, leiyang@redhat.com,
virtio-fs@lists.linux.dev, si-wei.liu@oracle.com,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] virtio: virtqueue_ordered_fill - VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER support
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 18:07:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJaqyWdxt+cPNR=unm6P1cGCKV=LwhuMYdVeQLbWF6wYLBLWKg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240520130048.1483177-4-jonah.palmer@oracle.com>
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 3:01 PM Jonah Palmer <jonah.palmer@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER feature support for the virtqueue_fill operation.
>
> The goal of the virtqueue_ordered_fill operation when the
> VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER feature has been negotiated is to search for this
> now-used element, set its length, and mark the element as filled in
> the VirtQueue's used_elems array.
>
> By marking the element as filled, it will indicate that this element has
> been processed and is ready to be flushed, so long as the element is
> in-order.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonah Palmer <jonah.palmer@oracle.com>
> ---
> hw/virtio/virtio.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index 7456d61bc8..01b6b32460 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -873,6 +873,38 @@ static void virtqueue_packed_fill(VirtQueue *vq, const VirtQueueElement *elem,
> vq->used_elems[idx].ndescs = elem->ndescs;
> }
>
> +static void virtqueue_ordered_fill(VirtQueue *vq, const VirtQueueElement *elem,
> + unsigned int len)
> +{
> + unsigned int i, steps, max_steps;
> +
> + i = vq->used_idx;
> + steps = 0;
> + /*
> + * We shouldn't need to increase 'i' by more than the distance
> + * between used_idx and last_avail_idx.
> + */
> + max_steps = (vq->last_avail_idx + vq->vring.num - vq->used_idx)
> + % vq->vring.num;
I may be missing something, but (+vq->vring.num) is redundant if we (%
vq->vring.num), isn't it?
> +
> + /* Search for element in vq->used_elems */
> + while (steps <= max_steps) {
> + /* Found element, set length and mark as filled */
> + if (vq->used_elems[i].index == elem->index) {
> + vq->used_elems[i].len = len;
> + vq->used_elems[i].in_order_filled = true;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + i += vq->used_elems[i].ndescs;
> + steps += vq->used_elems[i].ndescs;
> +
> + if (i >= vq->vring.num) {
> + i -= vq->vring.num;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
Let's report an error if we finish the loop. I think:
qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
"%s: %s cannot fill buffer id %u\n",
__func__, vdev->name, elem->index);
(or similar) should do.
apart form that,
Reviewed-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> static void virtqueue_packed_fill_desc(VirtQueue *vq,
> const VirtQueueElement *elem,
> unsigned int idx,
> @@ -923,7 +955,9 @@ void virtqueue_fill(VirtQueue *vq, const VirtQueueElement *elem,
> return;
> }
>
> - if (virtio_vdev_has_feature(vq->vdev, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED)) {
> + if (virtio_vdev_has_feature(vq->vdev, VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER)) {
> + virtqueue_ordered_fill(vq, elem, len);
> + } else if (virtio_vdev_has_feature(vq->vdev, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED)) {
> virtqueue_packed_fill(vq, elem, len, idx);
> } else {
> virtqueue_split_fill(vq, elem, len, idx);
> --
> 2.39.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-22 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-20 13:00 [PATCH v2 0/6] virtio,vhost: Add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER support Jonah Palmer
2024-05-20 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] virtio: Add bool to VirtQueueElement Jonah Palmer
2024-05-22 15:44 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-05-23 9:55 ` Jonah Palmer
2024-05-20 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] virtio: virtqueue_pop - VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER support Jonah Palmer
2024-05-22 15:45 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-05-23 9:56 ` Jonah Palmer
2024-05-20 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] virtio: virtqueue_ordered_fill " Jonah Palmer
2024-05-22 16:07 ` Eugenio Perez Martin [this message]
2024-05-23 10:29 ` Jonah Palmer
2024-05-23 10:47 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-05-23 11:10 ` Jonah Palmer
2024-05-20 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] virtio: virtqueue_ordered_flush " Jonah Palmer
2024-05-20 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] vhost, vhost-user: Add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to vhost feature bits Jonah Palmer via
2024-05-20 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] virtio: Add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER property definition Jonah Palmer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJaqyWdxt+cPNR=unm6P1cGCKV=LwhuMYdVeQLbWF6wYLBLWKg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jonah.palmer@oracle.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=leiyang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=raphael@enfabrica.net \
--cc=schalla@marvell.com \
--cc=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-fs@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).