From: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>
To: Sahil Siddiq <icegambit91@gmail.com>
Cc: sgarzare@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Sahil Siddiq <sahilcdq@proton.me>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 3/3] vhost: Allocate memory for packed vring
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:30:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJaqyWedOSc-jm5DnxyPNfmFNcuxnaUNt3jK6MoKB+Gyr2ZQ+Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89ae0aad-eb82-4f51-9384-689a19e1626d@gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 6:11 AM Sahil Siddiq <icegambit91@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 10/28/24 11:07 AM, Sahil Siddiq wrote:
> > [...]
> > The payload that VHOST_SET_VRING_BASE accepts depends on whether
> > split virtqueues or packed virtqueues are used [6]. In hw/virtio/vhost-
> > vdpa.c:vhost_vdpa_svq_setup() [7], the following payload is used which is
> > not suitable for packed virtqueues:
> >
> > struct vhost_vring_state s = {
> > .index = vq_index,
> > };
> >
> > Based on the implementation in the linux kernel, the payload needs to
> > be as shown below for the ioctl to succeed for packed virtqueues:
> >
> > struct vhost_vring_state s = {
> > .index = vq_index,
> > .num = 0x80008000,
> > };
> >
> > After making these changes, it looks like QEMU is able to set up the
> > virtqueues and shadow virtqueues are enabled as well.
> >
> > Unfortunately, before the L2 VM can finish booting the kernel crashes.
> > The reason is that even though packed virtqueues are to be used, the
> > kernel tries to run
> > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split() [8]
> > (instead of virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed) and throws an "invalid vring
> > head" error. I am still investigating this issue.
>
> I made a mistake here. "virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed" [1] in the linux
> kernel also throws the same error. I think the issue might be because
> hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c:vhost_vdpa_svq_map_rings [2] does not handle
> mapping packed virtqueues at the moment.
>
> Probably because of this, vq->packed.desc_state[id].data [1] is NULL in the
> kernel.
>
> Regarding one of the earlier reviews in the same thread [3]:
>
I think it is a good first step, yes. Looking forward to your findings!
> On 8/7/24 9:52 PM, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 1:22 PM Sahil Siddiq <icegambit91@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Allocate memory for the packed vq format and support
> >> packed vq in the SVQ "start" and "stop" operations.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sahil Siddiq <sahilcdq@proton.me>
> >> ---
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
> >> index 4c308ee53d..f4285db2b4 100644
> >> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
> >> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
> >> [...]
> >> @@ -672,6 +674,16 @@ size_t vhost_svq_device_area_size(const VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq)
> >> return ROUND_UP(used_size, qemu_real_host_page_size());
> >> }
> >>
> >> +size_t vhost_svq_memory_packed(const VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq)
> >> +{
> >> + size_t desc_size = sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc) * svq->num_free;
> >> + size_t driver_event_suppression = sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc_event);
> >> + size_t device_event_suppression = sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc_event);
> >> +
> >> + return ROUND_UP(desc_size + driver_event_suppression + device_event_suppression,
> >> + qemu_real_host_page_size());
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> /**
> >> * Set a new file descriptor for the guest to kick the SVQ and notify for avail
> >> *
> >> @@ -726,17 +738,30 @@ void vhost_svq_start(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq, VirtIODevice *vdev,
> >>
> >> svq->vring.num = virtio_queue_get_num(vdev, virtio_get_queue_index(vq));
> >> svq->num_free = svq->vring.num;
> >> - svq->vring.desc = mmap(NULL, vhost_svq_driver_area_size(svq),
> >> - PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> >> - -1, 0);
> >> - desc_size = sizeof(vring_desc_t) * svq->vring.num;
> >> - svq->vring.avail = (void *)((char *)svq->vring.desc + desc_size);
> >> - svq->vring.used = mmap(NULL, vhost_svq_device_area_size(svq),
> >> - PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> >> - -1, 0);
> >> - svq->desc_state = g_new0(SVQDescState, svq->vring.num);
> >> - svq->desc_next = g_new0(uint16_t, svq->vring.num);
> >> - for (unsigned i = 0; i < svq->vring.num - 1; i++) {
> >> + svq->is_packed = virtio_vdev_has_feature(svq->vdev, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED);
> >> +
> >> + if (virtio_vdev_has_feature(svq->vdev, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED)) {
> >> + svq->vring_packed.vring.desc = mmap(NULL, vhost_svq_memory_packed(svq),
> >> + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> >> + -1, 0);
> >> + desc_size = sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc) * svq->vring.num;
> >> + svq->vring_packed.vring.driver = (void *)((char *)svq->vring_packed.vring.desc + desc_size);
> >> + svq->vring_packed.vring.device = (void *)((char *)svq->vring_packed.vring.driver +
> >> + sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc_event));
> >
> > This is a great start but it will be problematic when you start
> > mapping the areas to the vdpa device. The driver area should be read
> > only for the device, but it is placed in the same page as a RW one.
> >
> > More on this later.
> >
> >> + } else {
> >> + svq->vring.desc = mmap(NULL, vhost_svq_driver_area_size(svq),
> >> + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> >> + -1, 0);
> >> + desc_size = sizeof(vring_desc_t) * svq->vring.num;
> >> + svq->vring.avail = (void *)((char *)svq->vring.desc + desc_size);
> >> + svq->vring.used = mmap(NULL, vhost_svq_device_area_size(svq),
> >> + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> >> + -1, 0);
> >> + }
> >
> > I think it will be beneficial to avoid "if (packed)" conditionals on
> > the exposed functions that give information about the memory maps.
> > These need to be replicated at
> > hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c:vhost_vdpa_svq_map_rings.
>
> Based on what I have understood, I'll need to have an if(packed)
> condition in vhost_vdpa_svq_map_rings() because the mappings will
> differ in the packed and split cases.
>
> > However, the current one depends on the driver area to live in the
> > same page as the descriptor area, so it is not suitable for this.
>
> Right, for the split case, svq->vring.desc and svq->vring.avail are
> mapped to the same page.
>
> svq->vring.desc = mmap(NULL, vhost_svq_driver_area_size(svq),
> PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> -1, 0);
> desc_size = sizeof(vring_desc_t) * svq->vring.num;
> svq->vring.avail = (void *)((char *)svq->vring.desc + desc_size);
>
> vhost_svq_driver_area_size() encompasses the descriptor area and avail ring.
>
> > So what about this action plan:
> > 1) Make the avail ring (or driver area) independent of the descriptor ring.
> > 2) Return the mapping permissions of the descriptor area (not needed
> > here, but needed for hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c:vhost_vdpa_svq_map_rings
>
> Does point 1 refer to mapping the descriptor and avail rings to separate
> pages for both split and packed cases. I am not sure if my understanding
> is correct.
>
> I believe, however, that this approach will make it easier to map the
> rings in the vdpa device. It might also help in removing the if(packed)
> condition in vhost_svq_start().
>
That's right, you understood it perfectly :). It's not a big deal but
it makes the code simpler in my opinion.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-02 11:21 [RFC v3 0/3] Add packed virtqueue to shadow virtqueue Sahil Siddiq
2024-08-02 11:21 ` [RFC v3 1/3] vhost: Introduce packed vq and add buffer elements Sahil Siddiq
2024-08-07 16:40 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-08-02 11:21 ` [RFC v3 2/3] vhost: Data structure changes to support packed vqs Sahil Siddiq
2024-08-02 11:21 ` [RFC v3 3/3] vhost: Allocate memory for packed vring Sahil Siddiq
2024-08-07 16:22 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-08-11 15:37 ` Sahil
2024-08-11 17:20 ` Sahil
2024-08-12 6:31 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-08-12 19:32 ` Sahil
2024-08-13 6:53 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-08-21 12:19 ` Sahil
2024-08-27 15:30 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-08-30 10:20 ` Sahil
2024-08-30 10:48 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-09-08 19:46 ` Sahil
2024-09-09 12:34 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-09-11 19:36 ` Sahil
2024-09-12 9:54 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-09-16 4:34 ` Sahil
2024-09-24 5:31 ` Sahil
2024-09-24 10:46 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-09-30 5:34 ` Sahil
2024-10-28 5:37 ` Sahil Siddiq
2024-10-28 8:10 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-10-31 5:10 ` Sahil Siddiq
2024-11-13 5:10 ` Sahil Siddiq
2024-11-13 11:30 ` Eugenio Perez Martin [this message]
2024-12-05 20:38 ` Sahil Siddiq
2024-08-07 16:41 ` [RFC v3 0/3] Add packed virtqueue to shadow virtqueue Eugenio Perez Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJaqyWedOSc-jm5DnxyPNfmFNcuxnaUNt3jK6MoKB+Gyr2ZQ+Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=icegambit91@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sahilcdq@proton.me \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).