From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36567) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbJjE-0007jd-EN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 23:47:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbJjD-00069g-Ce for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 23:47:20 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]:33784) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbJjD-00069c-7t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 23:47:19 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 38so82357021iol.0 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 20:47:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6167fa7a-2037-abdf-986e-be33747b51e4@twiddle.net> References: <20160819170025.22345-1-bobby.prani@gmail.com> <6167fa7a-2037-abdf-986e-be33747b51e4@twiddle.net> From: Pranith Kumar Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 23:46:48 -0400 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/4] Clean up TCG tests List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: qemu-devel , =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= , Paolo Bonzini , Peter Maydell On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 08/19/2016 10:00 AM, Pranith Kumar wrote: >> >> This RFC patch series cleans up the tcg tests in tests/tcg folder. >> >> The tests have bit-rotten and were not compiling or running. I fixed >> the Makefiles to make them compile though there are tests which do not >> pass. I plan to fix them if you think this approach is reasonable. >> >> The motivation is to add litmus tests to each arch and have them run >> using the 'make check' target to test consistency on TCG. >> >> There are no maintainers listed for this test folder. So I am cc'ing >> people who I think might be interested. > > > By what mechanism are these tests to be run? > I can't see that they're run with "make check" after this patchset... The tests currently fail, so I didn't think it would be appropriate to hook them up. If the rearrangement is acceptable and once I fix the tests, I will hook up 'make check' to run these tests. Do you think this plan is OK? Otherwise suggestions are welcome. Thanks, -- Pranith