From: Yong Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] migration: Avoid doing RAMBlock dirty sync in the initial iteration
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 10:09:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK9dgmZ_++jEmhRfO9QR3WQFs18AwUnvn=_dTyfUnv5PHXYBYA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZyELi_ax8zM_kFbZ@x1n>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5040 bytes --]
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 12:21 AM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 10:09:51AM +0800, yong.huang@smartx.com wrote:
> > From: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com>
> >
> > KVM always returns 1 when userspace retrieves a dirty bitmap for
> > the first time when KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET is enabled; in such
> > scenario, the RAMBlock dirty sync of the initial iteration can be
> > skipped.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com>
> > ---
> > migration/cpu-throttle.c | 3 ++-
> > migration/ram.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/migration/cpu-throttle.c b/migration/cpu-throttle.c
> > index 342681cdd4..06e3b1be78 100644
> > --- a/migration/cpu-throttle.c
> > +++ b/migration/cpu-throttle.c
> > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> > #include "hw/core/cpu.h"
> > #include "qemu/main-loop.h"
> > #include "sysemu/cpus.h"
> > +#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
> > #include "cpu-throttle.h"
> > #include "migration.h"
> > #include "migration-stats.h"
> > @@ -141,7 +142,7 @@ void cpu_throttle_dirty_sync_timer_tick(void *opaque)
> > * effect on guest performance, therefore omit it to avoid
> > * paying extra for the sync penalty.
> > */
> > - if (sync_cnt <= 1) {
> > + if (sync_cnt <= (kvm_dirty_log_manual_enabled() ? 0 : 1)) {
> > goto end;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> > index d284f63854..b312ebd69d 100644
> > --- a/migration/ram.c
> > +++ b/migration/ram.c
> > @@ -2718,7 +2718,7 @@ static void ram_list_init_bitmaps(void)
> > {
> > MigrationState *ms = migrate_get_current();
> > RAMBlock *block;
> > - unsigned long pages;
> > + unsigned long pages, clear_bmap_pages;
> > uint8_t shift;
> >
> > /* Skip setting bitmap if there is no RAM */
> > @@ -2736,6 +2736,7 @@ static void ram_list_init_bitmaps(void)
> >
> > RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) {
> > pages = block->max_length >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
> > + clear_bmap_pages = clear_bmap_size(pages, shift);
> > /*
> > * The initial dirty bitmap for migration must be set with
> all
> > * ones to make sure we'll migrate every guest RAM page to
> > @@ -2751,7 +2752,17 @@ static void ram_list_init_bitmaps(void)
> > block->file_bmap = bitmap_new(pages);
> > }
> > block->clear_bmap_shift = shift;
> > - block->clear_bmap = bitmap_new(clear_bmap_size(pages,
> shift));
> > + block->clear_bmap = bitmap_new(clear_bmap_pages);
> > + /*
> > + * Set the clear bitmap by default to enable dirty logging.
> > + *
> > + * Note that with KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET, dirty logging
> > + * will be enabled gradually in small chunks using
> > + * KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG
> > + */
> > + if (kvm_dirty_log_manual_enabled()) {
> > + bitmap_set(block->clear_bmap, 0, clear_bmap_pages);
> > + }
>
> Why it needs to be relevant to whether DIRTY_LOG is enabled?
>
> I wonder if we should always set clear_bmap to 1 unconditionally, as we
> always set bmap to all 1s by default.
>
OK, this works. We can drop it.
>
> Then we skip sync always during setup, dropping patch 1.
>
IIUC, KVM initializes the slot->dirty_bitmap with 1 only when
KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET is enabled, 0 otherwize.
This means that if KVM does not support the
KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET feature, userspace should
do the first sync so that KVM could set the WP bit and clear
the D-bit of the PTE.
Skipping first sync could handle this scenario?
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -2771,6 +2782,7 @@ static void
> migration_bitmap_clear_discarded_pages(RAMState *rs)
> >
> > static bool ram_init_bitmaps(RAMState *rs, Error **errp)
> > {
> > + Error *local_err = NULL;
> > bool ret = true;
> >
> > qemu_mutex_lock_ramlist();
> > @@ -2783,7 +2795,19 @@ static bool ram_init_bitmaps(RAMState *rs, Error
> **errp)
> > if (!ret) {
> > goto out_unlock;
> > }
> > - migration_bitmap_sync_precopy(false);
> > +
> > + if (kvm_dirty_log_manual_enabled()) {
> > + /*
> > + * Bypass the RAMBlock dirty sync and still publish a
> > + * notification.
> > + */
> > + if (precopy_notify(PRECOPY_NOTIFY_AFTER_BITMAP_SYNC,
> > + &local_err)) {
> > + error_report_err(local_err);
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + migration_bitmap_sync_precopy(false);
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> > out_unlock:
> > --
> > 2.27.0
> >
>
> --
> Peter Xu
>
>
--
Best regards
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8188 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-30 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-23 2:09 [PATCH RFC 0/2] migration: Skip sync in ram_init_bitmaps() yong.huang
2024-10-23 2:09 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] accel/kvm: Introduce kvm_dirty_log_manual_enabled yong.huang
2024-10-23 2:09 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] migration: Avoid doing RAMBlock dirty sync in the initial iteration yong.huang
2024-10-29 16:21 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-30 2:09 ` Yong Huang [this message]
2024-10-30 19:43 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-31 2:08 ` Yong Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAK9dgmZ_++jEmhRfO9QR3WQFs18AwUnvn=_dTyfUnv5PHXYBYA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=yong.huang@smartx.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).