public inbox for qemu-devel@nongnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yong Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Juraj Marcin" <jmarcin@redhat.com>,
	"Kirti Wankhede" <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>,
	"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Joao Martins" <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
	"Alex Williamson" <alex@shazbot.org>,
	"Yishai Hadas" <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	"Fabiano Rosas" <farosas@suse.de>,
	"Pranav Tyagi" <prtyagi@redhat.com>,
	"Zhiyi Guo" <zhguo@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Avihai Horon" <avihaih@nvidia.com>,
	"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 09/12] migration: Make iteration counter out of RAM
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 14:12:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK9dgmZb1RGvU5r-+Gudf2iZF4keG+0rJxfg6Rthws6v35XBFg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260319231302.123135-10-peterx@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5298 bytes --]

Thanks,

Reviewed-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com>

On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 7:13 AM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:

> It used to hide in RAM dirty sync path.  Now with more modules being able
> to slow sync on dirty information, keeping it there may not be good anymore
> because it's not RAM's own concept for iterations: all modules should
> follow.
>
> More importantly, mgmt may try to query dirty info (to make policy
> decisions like adjusting downtime) by listening to iteration count changes
> via QMP events.  So we must make sure the boost of iterations only happens
> _after_ the dirty sync operations with whatever form (RAM's dirty bitmap
> sync, or VFIO's different ioctls to fetch latest dirty info from kernel).
>
> Move this to core migration path to manage, together with the event
> generation, so that it can be well ordered with the sync operations for all
> modules.
>
> This brings a good side effect that we should have an old issue regarding
> to cpu_throttle_dirty_sync_timer_tick() which can randomly boost iteration
> counts (because it invokes sync ops).  Now it won't, which is actually the
> right behavior.
>
> Said that, we have code (not only QEMU, but likely mgmt too) assuming the
> 1st iteration will always shows dirty count to 1.  Make it initialized with
> 1 this time, because we'll miss the dirty sync for setup() on boosting this
> counter now.
>
> Cc: Yong Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
>  migration/migration-stats.h |  3 ++-
>  migration/migration.c       | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  migration/ram.c             |  6 ------
>  3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/migration-stats.h b/migration/migration-stats.h
> index 1153520f7a..326ddb0088 100644
> --- a/migration/migration-stats.h
> +++ b/migration/migration-stats.h
> @@ -43,7 +43,8 @@ typedef struct {
>       */
>      uint64_t dirty_pages_rate;
>      /*
> -     * Number of times we have synchronized guest bitmaps.
> +     * Number of times we have synchronized guest bitmaps.  This always
> +     * starts from 1 for the 1st iteration.
>       */
>      uint64_t dirty_sync_count;
>      /*
> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> index 42facb16d1..ad8a824585 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.c
> +++ b/migration/migration.c
> @@ -1654,10 +1654,15 @@ int migrate_init(MigrationState *s, Error **errp)
>      s->threshold_size = 0;
>      s->switchover_acked = false;
>      s->rdma_migration = false;
> +
>      /*
> -     * set mig_stats memory to zero for a new migration
> +     * set mig_stats memory to zero for a new migration.. except the
> +     * iteration counter, which we want to make sure it returns 1 for the
> +     * first iteration.
>       */
>      memset(&mig_stats, 0, sizeof(mig_stats));
> +    mig_stats.dirty_sync_count = 1;
> +
>      migration_reset_vfio_bytes_transferred();
>
>      s->postcopy_package_loaded = false;
> @@ -3230,10 +3235,28 @@ static bool
> migration_iteration_next_ready(MigrationState *s,
>  static void migration_iteration_go_next(MigPendingData *pending)
>  {
>      /*
> -     * Do a slow sync will achieve this.  TODO: move RAM iteration code
> -     * into the core layer.
> +     * Do a slow sync first before boosting the iteration count.
>       */
>      qemu_savevm_query_pending(pending, false);
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Boost dirty sync count to reflect we finished one iteration.
> +     *
> +     * NOTE: we need to make sure when this happens (together with the
> +     * event sent below) all modules have slow-synced the pending data
> +     * above.  That means a write mem barrier, but qatomic_add() should be
> +     * enough.
> +     *
> +     * It's because a mgmt could wait on the iteration event to query
> again
> +     * on pending data for policy changes (e.g. downtime adjustments).
> The
> +     * ordering will make sure the query will fetch the latest results
> from
> +     * all the modules.
> +     */
> +    qatomic_add(&mig_stats.dirty_sync_count, 1);
> +
> +    if (migrate_events()) {
> +        qapi_event_send_migration_pass(mig_stats.dirty_sync_count);
> +    }
>  }
>
>  /*
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index 89f761a471..29e9608715 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -1136,8 +1136,6 @@ static void migration_bitmap_sync(RAMState *rs, bool
> last_stage)
>      RAMBlock *block;
>      int64_t end_time;
>
> -    qatomic_add(&mig_stats.dirty_sync_count, 1);
> -
>      if (!rs->time_last_bitmap_sync) {
>          rs->time_last_bitmap_sync =
> qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME);
>      }
> @@ -1172,10 +1170,6 @@ static void migration_bitmap_sync(RAMState *rs,
> bool last_stage)
>          rs->num_dirty_pages_period = 0;
>          rs->bytes_xfer_prev = migration_transferred_bytes();
>      }
> -    if (migrate_events()) {
> -        uint64_t generation = qatomic_read(&mig_stats.dirty_sync_count);
> -        qapi_event_send_migration_pass(generation);
> -    }
>  }
>
>  void migration_bitmap_sync_precopy(bool last_stage)
> --
> 2.50.1
>
>

-- 
Best regards

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6771 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-20  6:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-19 23:12 [PATCH RFC 00/12] migration/vfio: Fix a few issues on API misuse or statistic reports Peter Xu
2026-03-19 23:12 ` [PATCH RFC 01/12] migration: Fix low possibility downtime violation Peter Xu
2026-03-20 12:26   ` Prasad Pandit
2026-03-19 23:12 ` [PATCH RFC 02/12] migration/qapi: Rename MigrationStats to MigrationRAMStats Peter Xu
2026-03-19 23:26   ` Peter Xu
2026-03-20  6:54   ` Markus Armbruster
2026-03-19 23:12 ` [PATCH RFC 03/12] vfio/migration: Throttle vfio_save_block() on data size to read Peter Xu
2026-03-25 14:10   ` Avihai Horon
2026-03-19 23:12 ` [PATCH RFC 04/12] vfio/migration: Cache stop size in VFIOMigration Peter Xu
2026-03-25 14:15   ` Avihai Horon
2026-03-19 23:12 ` [PATCH RFC 05/12] migration/treewide: Merge @state_pending_{exact|estimate} APIs Peter Xu
2026-03-24 10:35   ` Prasad Pandit
2026-03-25 15:20   ` Avihai Horon
2026-03-19 23:12 ` [PATCH RFC 06/12] migration: Use the new save_query_pending() API directly Peter Xu
2026-03-24  9:35   ` Prasad Pandit
2026-03-19 23:12 ` [PATCH RFC 07/12] migration: Introduce stopcopy_bytes in save_query_pending() Peter Xu
2026-03-24 11:05   ` Prasad Pandit
2026-03-25 16:54   ` Avihai Horon
2026-03-19 23:12 ` [PATCH RFC 08/12] vfio/migration: Fix incorrect reporting for VFIO pending data Peter Xu
2026-03-25 17:32   ` Avihai Horon
2026-03-19 23:12 ` [PATCH RFC 09/12] migration: Make iteration counter out of RAM Peter Xu
2026-03-20  6:12   ` Yong Huang [this message]
2026-03-20  9:49   ` Prasad Pandit
2026-03-19 23:13 ` [PATCH RFC 10/12] migration: Introduce a helper to return switchover bw estimate Peter Xu
2026-03-23 10:26   ` Prasad Pandit
2026-03-19 23:13 ` [PATCH RFC 11/12] migration: Calculate expected downtime on demand Peter Xu
2026-03-19 23:13 ` [PATCH RFC 12/12] migration: Fix calculation of expected_downtime to take VFIO info Peter Xu
2026-03-23 12:05   ` Prasad Pandit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK9dgmZb1RGvU5r-+Gudf2iZF4keG+0rJxfg6Rthws6v35XBFg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yong.huang@smartx.com \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=clg@redhat.com \
    --cc=farosas@suse.de \
    --cc=jmarcin@redhat.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=prtyagi@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zhguo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox