qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Song <hibriansong@gmail.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, bernd@bsbernd.com,
	 fam@euphon.net, hreitz@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com,
	stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] export/fuse: Add FUSE-over-io_uring for Storage Exports
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 08:00:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKWCU7VusNOUskuxc3RMTd+aLY6bSX+de-LiUhe9xpdmbzkn-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250830025025.3610-1-hibriansong@gmail.com>

We used fio to test a 1 GB file under both traditional FUSE and
FUSE-over-io_uring modes. The experiments were conducted with the
following iodepth and numjobs configurations: 1-1, 64-1, 1-4, and 64-4,
with 70% read and 30% write, resulting in a total of eight test cases,
measuring both latency and throughput.

Test results:

https://gist.github.com/hibriansong/a4849903387b297516603e83b53bbde4




On 8/29/25 10:50 PM, Brian Song wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a GSoC project. More details are available here:
> https://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2025#FUSE-over-io_uring_exports
>
> This patch series includes:
> - Add a round-robin mechanism to distribute the kernel-required Ring
> Queues to FUSE Queues
> - Support multiple in-flight requests (multiple ring entries)
> - Add tests for FUSE-over-io_uring
>
> More detail in the v2 cover letter:
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2025-08/msg00140.html
>
> And in the v1 cover letter:
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2025-07/msg00280.html
>
>
> Brian Song (4):
>    export/fuse: add opt to enable FUSE-over-io_uring
>    export/fuse: process FUSE-over-io_uring requests
>    export/fuse: Safe termination for FUSE-uring
>    iotests: add tests for FUSE-over-io_uring
>
>   block/export/fuse.c                  | 838 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>   docs/tools/qemu-storage-daemon.rst   |  11 +-
>   qapi/block-export.json               |   5 +-
>   storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon.c |   1 +
>   tests/qemu-iotests/check             |   2 +
>   tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc         |  45 +-
>   util/fdmon-io_uring.c                |   5 +-
>   7 files changed, 717 insertions(+), 190 deletions(-)
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-30 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-30  2:50 [PATCH 0/4] export/fuse: Add FUSE-over-io_uring for Storage Exports Brian Song
2025-08-30  2:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] export/fuse: add opt to enable FUSE-over-io_uring Brian Song
2025-09-03 10:53   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-03 18:00     ` Brian Song
2025-09-09 14:48       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-09 17:46         ` Brian Song
2025-09-09 18:05           ` Bernd Schubert
2025-09-03 11:26   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-16 19:08   ` Kevin Wolf
2025-09-17 19:47     ` Brian Song
2025-09-19 14:13       ` Kevin Wolf
2025-08-30  2:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] export/fuse: process FUSE-over-io_uring requests Brian Song
2025-09-03 11:51   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-08 19:09     ` Brian Song
2025-09-08 19:45       ` Bernd Schubert
2025-09-09  1:10         ` Brian Song
2025-09-09 15:26       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-19 13:54   ` Kevin Wolf
2025-08-30  2:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] export/fuse: Safe termination for FUSE-uring Brian Song
2025-09-09 19:33   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-09 20:51     ` Brian Song
2025-09-10 13:17       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-15  5:43     ` Brian Song
2025-09-17 13:01       ` Hanna Czenczek
2025-09-17 22:06         ` Brian Song
2025-09-22 17:41           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-22 17:51           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-08-30  2:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] iotests: add tests for FUSE-over-io_uring Brian Song
2025-09-09 19:38   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-09 20:51     ` Brian Song
2025-09-10 13:14       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-12  2:22         ` Brian Song
2025-09-15 17:41           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-08-30 12:00 ` Brian Song [this message]
2025-09-03  9:49   ` [PATCH 0/4] export/fuse: Add FUSE-over-io_uring for Storage Exports Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-03 18:11     ` Brian Song
2025-09-16 12:18       ` Kevin Wolf
2025-09-04 19:32   ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKWCU7VusNOUskuxc3RMTd+aLY6bSX+de-LiUhe9xpdmbzkn-Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hibriansong@gmail.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=bernd@bsbernd.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).