From: Li Qiang <liq3ea@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Li Qiang <liq3ea@163.com>,
Qemu Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] ioapic: use irq number instead of vector in ioapic_eoi_broadcast
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:22:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKXe6SJOYQ38fADJRHxw4HdXC9hqoMPdxgTtLJt49LDxYFCSvw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190622002119.126834-1-liq3ea@163.com>
Ping, what's the status of this patch.
Li Qiang <liq3ea@163.com> 于2019年6月22日周六 上午8:21写道:
> When emulating irqchip in qemu, such as following command:
>
> x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -m 1024 -smp 4 -hda /home/test/test.img
> -machine kernel-irqchip=off --enable-kvm -vnc :0 -device edu -monitor stdio
>
> We will get a crash with following asan output:
>
> (qemu) /home/test/qemu5/qemu/hw/intc/ioapic.c:266:27: runtime error: index
> 35 out of bounds for type 'int [24]'
> =================================================================
> ==113504==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address
> 0x61b000003114 at pc 0x5579e3c7a80f bp 0x7fd004bf8c10 sp 0x7fd004bf8c00
> WRITE of size 4 at 0x61b000003114 thread T4
> #0 0x5579e3c7a80e in ioapic_eoi_broadcast
> /home/test/qemu5/qemu/hw/intc/ioapic.c:266
> #1 0x5579e3c6f480 in apic_eoi /home/test/qemu5/qemu/hw/intc/apic.c:428
> #2 0x5579e3c720a7 in apic_mem_write
> /home/test/qemu5/qemu/hw/intc/apic.c:802
> #3 0x5579e3b1e31a in memory_region_write_accessor
> /home/test/qemu5/qemu/memory.c:503
> #4 0x5579e3b1e6a2 in access_with_adjusted_size
> /home/test/qemu5/qemu/memory.c:569
> #5 0x5579e3b28d77 in memory_region_dispatch_write
> /home/test/qemu5/qemu/memory.c:1497
> #6 0x5579e3a1b36b in flatview_write_continue
> /home/test/qemu5/qemu/exec.c:3323
> #7 0x5579e3a1b633 in flatview_write /home/test/qemu5/qemu/exec.c:3362
> #8 0x5579e3a1bcb1 in address_space_write
> /home/test/qemu5/qemu/exec.c:3452
> #9 0x5579e3a1bd03 in address_space_rw /home/test/qemu5/qemu/exec.c:3463
> #10 0x5579e3b8b979 in kvm_cpu_exec
> /home/test/qemu5/qemu/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c:2045
> #11 0x5579e3ae4499 in qemu_kvm_cpu_thread_fn
> /home/test/qemu5/qemu/cpus.c:1287
> #12 0x5579e4cbdb9f in qemu_thread_start util/qemu-thread-posix.c:502
> #13 0x7fd0146376da in start_thread
> (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x76da)
> #14 0x7fd01436088e in __clone (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x12188e
>
> This is because in ioapic_eoi_broadcast function, we uses 'vector' to
> index the 's->irq_eoi'. To fix this, we should uses the irq number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Qiang <liq3ea@163.com>
> ---
> Change since v1:
> remove auto-generated unnecessary message
>
> hw/intc/ioapic.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/ioapic.c b/hw/intc/ioapic.c
> index 7074489fdf..711775cc6f 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/ioapic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/ioapic.c
> @@ -245,8 +245,8 @@ void ioapic_eoi_broadcast(int vector)
> s->ioredtbl[n] = entry & ~IOAPIC_LVT_REMOTE_IRR;
>
> if (!(entry & IOAPIC_LVT_MASKED) && (s->irr & (1 << n))) {
> - ++s->irq_eoi[vector];
> - if (s->irq_eoi[vector] >= SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT) {
> + ++s->irq_eoi[n];
> + if (s->irq_eoi[n] >= SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT) {
> /*
> * Real hardware does not deliver the interrupt
> immediately
> * during eoi broadcast, and this lets a buggy guest
> make
> @@ -254,16 +254,16 @@ void ioapic_eoi_broadcast(int vector)
> * level-triggered interrupt. Emulate this behavior
> if we
> * detect an interrupt storm.
> */
> - s->irq_eoi[vector] = 0;
> + s->irq_eoi[n] = 0;
> timer_mod_anticipate(s->delayed_ioapic_service_timer,
>
> qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL) +
> NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND / 100);
> - trace_ioapic_eoi_delayed_reassert(vector);
> + trace_ioapic_eoi_delayed_reassert(n);
> } else {
> ioapic_service(s);
> }
> } else {
> - s->irq_eoi[vector] = 0;
> + s->irq_eoi[n] = 0;
> }
> }
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-28 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-22 0:21 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] ioapic: use irq number instead of vector in ioapic_eoi_broadcast Li Qiang
2019-06-24 9:42 ` Peter Xu
2019-06-24 11:08 ` Li Qiang
2019-06-24 11:20 ` Peter Xu
2019-06-24 11:24 ` Li Qiang
2019-06-28 2:22 ` Li Qiang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKXe6SJOYQ38fADJRHxw4HdXC9hqoMPdxgTtLJt49LDxYFCSvw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=liq3ea@gmail.com \
--cc=liq3ea@163.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).