From: Li Qiang <liq3ea@gmail.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com>,
QEMU <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net: tap: use qemu_set_nonblock
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:26:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKXe6SLDcOJx+x_5wod6Pvy1oASEEQ06fbMDrWQnQg31FbQ_VQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf59e483-d958-29ac-5e17-50f56405c629@redhat.com>
Hi Jason,
What's the status of this patch? I don't see it in upstream.
Thanks,
Li Qiang
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> 于2018年11月22日周四 上午10:22写道:
>
> On 2018/11/22 上午1:39, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:30:41AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> On 11/21/18 6:23 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>
> >>>> I agree it is good to preserve fcntl flags though, so this patch
> >>>> looks desirable.
> >>>>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> >>> Sure
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> >>>
> >>> but really not for this release I guess as we are in freeze.
> >> We're in freeze, so the criteria is: Does this fix a bug that we would
> >> otherwise not want in 3.1. If the code is pre-existing (that is, if
> 3.0 was
> >> released with the same problem), or then delaying the patch to 4.0 is an
> >> easier call to make. If the problem is new to 3.1, then fixing it for
> -rc3
> >> is still reasonable with maintainer discretion (although once -rc3
> lands, we
> >> want as little as possible to go into -rc4, even if our track record
> says we
> >> will be unable to avoid -rc4 altogether).
> >>
> >> I think that losing flags is likely enough to be a noticeable bug worth
> >> fixing for 3.1, but I did not research when the problem was introduced,
> so I
> >> don't have a strong preference for 3.1 vs. 4.0.
> > Maintainer in this case is Jason, so it's up to him
>
>
> I've queued this for 4.0.
>
> Thanks
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-10 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-21 11:21 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net: tap: use qemu_set_nonblock Li Qiang
2018-11-21 11:28 ` Marc-André Lureau
2018-11-21 11:34 ` Li Qiang
2018-11-21 11:57 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-11-21 12:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-11-21 14:21 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-11-21 17:30 ` Eric Blake
2018-11-21 17:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-11-22 2:22 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-10 11:26 ` Li Qiang [this message]
2019-03-11 9:35 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKXe6SLDcOJx+x_5wod6Pvy1oASEEQ06fbMDrWQnQg31FbQ_VQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=liq3ea@gmail.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).