qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>
To: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com>
Cc: Chih-Min Chao <chihmin.chao@sifive.com>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL 05/20] target/riscv: Check nanboxed inputs in trans_rvf.inc.c
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:46:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKmqyKMBpR0R4C+81GVjjcq39rHDJ9YHUTekopogxnsh1UYWhQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39d42765-01de-2439-093d-c0246d81a7ce@c-sky.com>

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 7:14 PM LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020/8/13 6:30, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> >
> > If a 32-bit input is not properly nanboxed, then the input is replaced
> > with the default qnan.  The only inline expansion is for the sign-changing
> > set of instructions: FSGNJ.S, FSGNJX.S, FSGNJN.S.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com>
> > Message-Id: <20200724002807.441147-6-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> > ---
> >   target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.inc.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++------
> >   target/riscv/translate.c                | 18 +++++++
> >   2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.inc.c b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.inc.c
> > index 264d3139f1..f9a9e0643a 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.inc.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.inc.c
> > @@ -161,47 +161,86 @@ static bool trans_fsgnj_s(DisasContext *ctx, arg_fsgnj_s *a)
> >   {
> >       REQUIRE_FPU;
> >       REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVF);
> > +
> >       if (a->rs1 == a->rs2) { /* FMOV */
> > -        tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
> > +        gen_check_nanbox_s(cpu_fpr[a->rd], cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
> >       } else { /* FSGNJ */
> > -        tcg_gen_deposit_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], cpu_fpr[a->rs2], cpu_fpr[a->rs1],
> > -                            0, 31);
> > +        TCGv_i64 rs1 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> > +        TCGv_i64 rs2 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> > +
> > +        gen_check_nanbox_s(rs1, cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
> > +        gen_check_nanbox_s(rs2, cpu_fpr[a->rs2]);
> > +
> > +        /* This formulation retains the nanboxing of rs2. */
> > +        tcg_gen_deposit_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], rs2, rs1, 0, 31);
> > +        tcg_temp_free_i64(rs1);
> > +        tcg_temp_free_i64(rs2);
> >       }
> > -    gen_nanbox_s(cpu_fpr[a->rd], cpu_fpr[a->rd]);
> >       mark_fs_dirty(ctx);
> >       return true;
> >   }
> >
> >   static bool trans_fsgnjn_s(DisasContext *ctx, arg_fsgnjn_s *a)
> >   {
> > +    TCGv_i64 rs1, rs2, mask;
> > +
> >       REQUIRE_FPU;
> >       REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVF);
> > +
> > +    rs1 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> > +    gen_check_nanbox_s(rs1, cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
> > +
> >       if (a->rs1 == a->rs2) { /* FNEG */
> > -        tcg_gen_xori_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], cpu_fpr[a->rs1], INT32_MIN);
> > +        tcg_gen_xori_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], rs1, MAKE_64BIT_MASK(31, 1));
> >       } else {
> > -        TCGv_i64 t0 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> > -        tcg_gen_not_i64(t0, cpu_fpr[a->rs2]);
> > -        tcg_gen_deposit_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], t0, cpu_fpr[a->rs1], 0, 31);
> > -        tcg_temp_free_i64(t0);
> > +        rs2 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> > +        gen_check_nanbox_s(rs2, cpu_fpr[a->rs2]);
> > +
> > +        /*
> > +         * Replace bit 31 in rs1 with inverse in rs2.
> > +         * This formulation retains the nanboxing of rs1.
> > +         */
> > +        mask = tcg_const_i64(~MAKE_64BIT_MASK(31, 1));
> > +        tcg_gen_andc_i64(rs2, mask, rs2);
> Hi Alistair,
>
> As Chih-Min said, it's wrong here.  He has given the correct patch code
> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg728540.html
>
> We can either  squash the code to this patch or add an separate patch
> later. I prefer the former.
> Thanks very much.

Richard are you ok if I squash this diff into the patch and send a PR v2?

diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.inc.c
b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.inc.c
index f9a9e0643a..76f281d275 100644
--- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.inc.c
+++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.inc.c
@@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ static bool trans_fsgnjn_s(DisasContext *ctx,
arg_fsgnjn_s *a)
          * This formulation retains the nanboxing of rs1.
          */
         mask = tcg_const_i64(~MAKE_64BIT_MASK(31, 1));
-        tcg_gen_andc_i64(rs2, mask, rs2);
+        tcg_gen_not_i64(rs2, rs2);         // forget to inverse rs2
+        tcg_gen_andc_i64(rs2, rs2, mask);  //mask needs to be
         tcg_gen_and_i64(rs1, mask, rs1);
         tcg_gen_or_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], rs1, rs2);


Alistair

>
> Zhiwei
> > +        tcg_gen_and_i64(rs1, mask, rs1);
> > +        tcg_gen_or_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], rs1, rs2);
> > +
> > +        tcg_temp_free_i64(mask);
> > +        tcg_temp_free_i64(rs2);
> >       }
> > -    gen_nanbox_s(cpu_fpr[a->rd], cpu_fpr[a->rd]);
> > +    tcg_temp_free_i64(rs1);
> > +
> >       mark_fs_dirty(ctx);
> >       return true;
> >   }
> >
> >   static bool trans_fsgnjx_s(DisasContext *ctx, arg_fsgnjx_s *a)
> >   {
> > +    TCGv_i64 rs1, rs2;
> > +
> >       REQUIRE_FPU;
> >       REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVF);
> > +
> > +    rs1 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> > +    gen_check_nanbox_s(rs1, cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
> > +
> >       if (a->rs1 == a->rs2) { /* FABS */
> > -        tcg_gen_andi_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], cpu_fpr[a->rs1], ~INT32_MIN);
> > +        tcg_gen_andi_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], rs1, ~MAKE_64BIT_MASK(31, 1));
> >       } else {
> > -        TCGv_i64 t0 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> > -        tcg_gen_andi_i64(t0, cpu_fpr[a->rs2], INT32_MIN);
> > -        tcg_gen_xor_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], cpu_fpr[a->rs1], t0);
> > -        tcg_temp_free_i64(t0);
> > +        rs2 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> > +        gen_check_nanbox_s(rs2, cpu_fpr[a->rs2]);
> > +
> > +        /*
> > +         * Xor bit 31 in rs1 with that in rs2.
> > +         * This formulation retains the nanboxing of rs1.
> > +         */
> > +        tcg_gen_andi_i64(rs2, rs2, MAKE_64BIT_MASK(31, 1));
> > +        tcg_gen_xor_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], rs1, rs2);
> > +
> > +        tcg_temp_free_i64(rs2);
> >       }
> > -    gen_nanbox_s(cpu_fpr[a->rd], cpu_fpr[a->rd]);
> > +    tcg_temp_free_i64(rs1);
> > +
> >       mark_fs_dirty(ctx);
> >       return true;
> >   }
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/translate.c b/target/riscv/translate.c
> > index 12a746da97..bf35182776 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/translate.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/translate.c
> > @@ -101,6 +101,24 @@ static void gen_nanbox_s(TCGv_i64 out, TCGv_i64 in)
> >       tcg_gen_ori_i64(out, in, MAKE_64BIT_MASK(32, 32));
> >   }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * A narrow n-bit operation, where n < FLEN, checks that input operands
> > + * are correctly Nan-boxed, i.e., all upper FLEN - n bits are 1.
> > + * If so, the least-significant bits of the input are used, otherwise the
> > + * input value is treated as an n-bit canonical NaN (v2.2 section 9.2).
> > + *
> > + * Here, the result is always nan-boxed, even the canonical nan.
> > + */
> > +static void gen_check_nanbox_s(TCGv_i64 out, TCGv_i64 in)
> > +{
> > +    TCGv_i64 t_max = tcg_const_i64(0xffffffff00000000ull);
> > +    TCGv_i64 t_nan = tcg_const_i64(0xffffffff7fc00000ull);
> > +
> > +    tcg_gen_movcond_i64(TCG_COND_GEU, out, in, t_max, in, t_nan);
> > +    tcg_temp_free_i64(t_max);
> > +    tcg_temp_free_i64(t_nan);
> > +}
> > +
> >   static void generate_exception(DisasContext *ctx, int excp)
> >   {
> >       tcg_gen_movi_tl(cpu_pc, ctx->base.pc_next);
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-13 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-12 22:30 [PULL 00/20] riscv-to-apply queue Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 01/20] target/riscv: Generate nanboxed results from fp helpers Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 02/20] target/riscv: Generalize gen_nanbox_fpr to gen_nanbox_s Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 03/20] target/riscv: Generate nanboxed results from trans_rvf.inc.c Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 04/20] target/riscv: Check nanboxed inputs to fp helpers Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 05/20] target/riscv: Check nanboxed inputs in trans_rvf.inc.c Alistair Francis
2020-08-13  2:14   ` LIU Zhiwei
2020-08-13 14:46     ` Alistair Francis [this message]
2020-08-13 16:48       ` Richard Henderson
2020-08-13 21:19         ` Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 06/20] target/riscv: Clean up fmv.w.x Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 07/20] target/riscv: check before allocating TCG temps Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 08/20] hw/riscv: sifive_u: Add a dummy L2 cache controller device Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 09/20] riscv: Fix bug in setting pmpcfg CSR for RISCV64 Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 10/20] configure: Create symbolic links for pc-bios/*.elf files Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 11/20] roms/opensbi: Upgrade from v0.7 to v0.8 Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 12/20] roms/Makefile: Build the generic platform for RISC-V OpenSBI firmware Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 13/20] hw/riscv: Use pre-built bios image of generic platform for virt & sifive_u Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 14/20] hw/riscv: spike: Change the default bios to use generic platform image Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 15/20] gitlab-ci/opensbi: Update GitLab CI to build generic platform Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 16/20] target/riscv: Fix the translation of physical address Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 17/20] target/riscv: Change the TLB page size depends on PMP entries Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 18/20] hw/intc: ibex_plic: Update the pending irqs Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 19/20] hw/intc: ibex_plic: Don't allow repeat interrupts on claimed lines Alistair Francis
2020-08-12 22:30 ` [PULL 20/20] hw/intc: ibex_plic: Honour source priorities Alistair Francis
2020-08-13  7:53 ` [PULL 00/20] riscv-to-apply queue Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKmqyKMBpR0R4C+81GVjjcq39rHDJ9YHUTekopogxnsh1UYWhQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=alistair23@gmail.com \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=chihmin.chao@sifive.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).