From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F423C433ED for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 02:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1808C613B5 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 02:12:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1808C613B5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:50856 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leTV4-0001Gm-59 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 22:12:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60024) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leTSo-0000Zw-Sx; Wed, 05 May 2021 22:10:11 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x132.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::132]:44860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leTSm-0008Oo-UQ; Wed, 05 May 2021 22:10:06 -0400 Received: by mail-il1-x132.google.com with SMTP id i22so3454829ila.11; Wed, 05 May 2021 19:10:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1YnX9Cm3enqdv0yfI/EdfbngfUVrtcH6oNGxderYxdE=; b=aYFRQHi6vpUdj8fNw9WPUz2AIqkPMK6H00cY13nURagG0VuNNPhuYN6qgC4du2legk vITSssWJMo9TdvBo54pZB9gMon/G/Mj3sQUCQIBs2YYzOggfLqaLBqhbSN+ejsN1Z7F0 rzvBc6TEntOl/Qp1YMI7PS6nZ7PaQietZdXvhHBPCkPNgzeQ0W2HxAUOwXazmF+ZhDwS /MQhOcrRSuSmWlKwPmuGX+v+TC7fjXCD0yHXZkDK6IzCLMmpp+RRY0TcX27rKBg8qZ8I 5dqBD6Hsqy6jHLgelCO6oyBBOeYFSxfrmlCTQU7i0Z2RepVDDEjdf7iyeqi5nNN5wp5O J7Ew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1YnX9Cm3enqdv0yfI/EdfbngfUVrtcH6oNGxderYxdE=; b=Bby5NkVb/02+EssXOaOYZozZL8QR4i0lBXLkGNqp/2tD3W6aDfW99aHmuJR4hm7GxO t/ZIYBwf/C/SwdRKgpeG9iNq5ulnCynVEB247uUcrkagevh2F4On57wai3RfE1OrQx4N FsFK2m5bJYIzmyqPp1GoLN0ew5HHXvIA56y00pkDfA7U48IyEKEPQXuT6jj9URp5jptg CTXLG9wDCL6pjD3pQ2Bn8ojYejLjoahCPynXSsJgiqWJKsq890vjj9NV01JHKD+LSlPo sUSfIfLLsIK0QtE/ksxwDQgAFgKk6ITZhjmNm4qDxm3ri8Y5p1EgF7t/TjE2pp1yzzGG FhBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531WYE4LWnCi5MOZsWULkqZvcEW2slZOnYwD+fIif0FSAzBwi1ci SEs3fJclZBw01vAKXfQk80zPPrTn/I5XuSSNxQ0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJbW0JHg5VJptvSmtlWVUujQ0bvv2CCinZHcKqEZ20hufV84k4IoAeA6gfywAsFOH0Ciy2zkXOa8LDqSJhuZo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:eac:: with SMTP id u12mr1863475ilj.177.1620267003422; Wed, 05 May 2021 19:10:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210420213656.85148-1-josemartins90@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20210420213656.85148-1-josemartins90@gmail.com> From: Alistair Francis Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 12:09:37 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] target/riscv: fix wfi exception behavior To: Jose Martins Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::132; envelope-from=alistair23@gmail.com; helo=mail-il1-x132.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "open list:RISC-V TCG CPUs" , Sagar Karandikar , Bastian Koppelmann , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , Alistair Francis , Palmer Dabbelt Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 7:37 AM Jose Martins wrote: > > The wfi exception trigger behavior should take into account user mode, > hstatus.vtw, and the fact the an wfi might raise different types of > exceptions depending on various factors: > > If supervisor mode is not present: > > - an illegal instruction exception should be generated if user mode > executes and wfi instruction and mstatus.tw = 1. > > If supervisor mode is present: > > - when a wfi instruction is executed, an illegal exception should be triggered > if either the current mode is user or the mode is supervisor and mstatus.tw is > set. > > Plus, if the hypervisor extensions are enabled: > > - a virtual instruction exception should be raised when a wfi is executed from > virtual-user or virtual-supervisor and hstatus.vtw is set. > > Signed-off-by: Jose Martins Thanks! Applied to riscv-to-apply.next Alistair > --- > Alistair, I hope you've agreed with my argumentis for the previous version > of the patch. As promised, I submit this version which takes into account M/U > only harts. It checks for the presence of the RVS extension. If it is > not present mstatus.tw takes effect over the exection of wfi in user > mode. > > target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 1 + > target/riscv/op_helper.c | 11 ++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h > index 24b24c69c5..ed8b97c788 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h > @@ -436,6 +436,7 @@ > #define HSTATUS_HU 0x00000200 > #define HSTATUS_VGEIN 0x0003F000 > #define HSTATUS_VTVM 0x00100000 > +#define HSTATUS_VTW 0x00200000 > #define HSTATUS_VTSR 0x00400000 > #if defined(TARGET_RISCV64) > #define HSTATUS_VSXL 0x300000000 > diff --git a/target/riscv/op_helper.c b/target/riscv/op_helper.c > index d55def76cf..15982a7a33 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/op_helper.c > +++ b/target/riscv/op_helper.c > @@ -173,10 +173,15 @@ target_ulong helper_mret(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong cpu_pc_deb) > void helper_wfi(CPURISCVState *env) > { > CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env); > + bool rvs = riscv_has_ext(env, RVS); > + bool prv_u = env->priv == PRV_U; > + bool prv_s = env->priv == PRV_S; > > - if ((env->priv == PRV_S && > - get_field(env->mstatus, MSTATUS_TW)) || > - riscv_cpu_virt_enabled(env)) { > + if (((prv_s || (!rvs && prv_u)) && get_field(env->mstatus, MSTATUS_TW)) || > + (rvs && prv_u && !riscv_cpu_virt_enabled(env))) { > + riscv_raise_exception(env, RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST, GETPC()); > + } else if (riscv_cpu_virt_enabled(env) && (prv_u || > + (prv_s && get_field(env->hstatus, HSTATUS_VTW)))) { > riscv_raise_exception(env, RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT, GETPC()); > } else { > cs->halted = 1; > -- > 2.25.1 > >