From: Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>
To: Robbin Ehn <rehn@rivosinc.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, palmer@rivosinc.com, laurent@vivier.eu,
qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
ajones@ventanamicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-user/riscv: Add syscall riscv_hwprobe
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 12:24:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKmqyKNpE7gCMXqWnxCp58v+aXb=hWswniOTthM7joL+E+1Q_A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06a4543df2aa6101ca9a48f21a3198064b4f1f87.camel@rivosinc.com>
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 6:25 PM Robbin Ehn <rehn@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> This patch adds the new syscall for the
> "RISC-V Hardware Probing Interface"
> (https://docs.kernel.org/riscv/hwprobe.html).
>
> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robbin Ehn <rehn@rivosinc.com>
Thanks for the patch!
Do you mind re-sending this when 6.4 comes out? I would like it in a
kernel release before we pick it up
Alistair
> ---
> v1->v2: Moved to syscall.c
> v2->v3: Separate function, get/put user
> v3->patch
> ---
> linux-user/riscv/syscall32_nr.h | 1 +
> linux-user/riscv/syscall64_nr.h | 1 +
> linux-user/syscall.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/riscv/syscall32_nr.h b/linux-user/riscv/syscall32_nr.h
> index 1327d7dffa..412e58e5b2 100644
> --- a/linux-user/riscv/syscall32_nr.h
> +++ b/linux-user/riscv/syscall32_nr.h
> @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@
> #define TARGET_NR_accept4 242
> #define TARGET_NR_arch_specific_syscall 244
> #define TARGET_NR_riscv_flush_icache (TARGET_NR_arch_specific_syscall + 15)
> +#define TARGET_NR_riscv_hwprobe (TARGET_NR_arch_specific_syscall + 14)
> #define TARGET_NR_prlimit64 261
> #define TARGET_NR_fanotify_init 262
> #define TARGET_NR_fanotify_mark 263
> diff --git a/linux-user/riscv/syscall64_nr.h b/linux-user/riscv/syscall64_nr.h
> index 6659751933..29e1eb2075 100644
> --- a/linux-user/riscv/syscall64_nr.h
> +++ b/linux-user/riscv/syscall64_nr.h
> @@ -251,6 +251,7 @@
> #define TARGET_NR_recvmmsg 243
> #define TARGET_NR_arch_specific_syscall 244
> #define TARGET_NR_riscv_flush_icache (TARGET_NR_arch_specific_syscall + 15)
> +#define TARGET_NR_riscv_hwprobe (TARGET_NR_arch_specific_syscall + 14)
> #define TARGET_NR_wait4 260
> #define TARGET_NR_prlimit64 261
> #define TARGET_NR_fanotify_init 262
> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
> index f2cb101d83..55becf3666 100644
> --- a/linux-user/syscall.c
> +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
> @@ -8874,6 +8874,147 @@ static int do_getdents64(abi_long dirfd, abi_long arg2, abi_long count)
> }
> #endif /* TARGET_NR_getdents64 */
>
> +#if defined(TARGET_NR_riscv_hwprobe)
> +
> +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MVENDORID 0
> +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MARCHID 1
> +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MIMPID 2
> +
> +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR 3
> +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA (1 << 0)
> +
> +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0 4
> +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_FD (1 << 0)
> +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_C (1 << 1)
> +
> +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0 5
> +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN (0 << 0)
> +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED (1 << 0)
> +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SLOW (2 << 0)
> +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST (3 << 0)
> +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED (4 << 0)
> +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_MASK (7 << 0)
> +
> +struct riscv_hwprobe {
> + abi_llong key;
> + abi_ullong value;
> +};
> +
> +static void risc_hwprobe_fill_pairs(CPURISCVState *env,
> + struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
> + size_t pair_count)
> +{
> + const RISCVCPUConfig *cfg = riscv_cpu_cfg(env);
> +
> + for (; pair_count > 0; pair_count--, pair++) {
> + abi_llong key;
> + abi_ullong value;
> + __put_user(0, &pair->value);
> + __get_user(key, &pair->key);
> + switch (key) {
> + case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MVENDORID:
> + __put_user(cfg->mvendorid, &pair->value);
> + break;
> + case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MARCHID:
> + __put_user(cfg->marchid, &pair->value);
> + break;
> + case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MIMPID:
> + __put_user(cfg->mimpid, &pair->value);
> + break;
> + case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR:
> + value = riscv_has_ext(env, RVI) &&
> + riscv_has_ext(env, RVM) &&
> + riscv_has_ext(env, RVA) ?
> + RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA : 0;
> + __put_user(value, &pair->value);
> + break;
> + case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0:
> + value = riscv_has_ext(env, RVF) &&
> + riscv_has_ext(env, RVD) ?
> + RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_FD : 0;
> + value |= riscv_has_ext(env, RVC) ?
> + RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_C : pair->value;
> + __put_user(value, &pair->value);
> + break;
> + case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0:
> + __put_user(RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST, &pair->value);
> + break;
> + default:
> + __put_user(-1, &pair->key);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int cpu_set_valid(abi_long arg3, abi_long arg4)
> +{
> + int ret, i, tmp;
> + size_t host_mask_size, target_mask_size;
> + unsigned long *host_mask;
> +
> + /*
> + * cpu_set_t represent CPU masks as bit masks of type unsigned long *.
> + * arg3 contains the cpu count.
> + */
> + tmp = (8 * sizeof(abi_ulong));
> + target_mask_size = ((arg3 + tmp - 1) / tmp) * sizeof(abi_ulong);
> + host_mask_size = (target_mask_size + (sizeof(*host_mask) - 1)) &
> + ~(sizeof(*host_mask) - 1);
> +
> + host_mask = alloca(host_mask_size);
> +
> + ret = target_to_host_cpu_mask(host_mask, host_mask_size,
> + arg4, target_mask_size);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0 ; i < host_mask_size / sizeof(*host_mask); i++) {
> + if (host_mask[i] != 0) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
> + return -TARGET_EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static abi_long do_riscv_hwprobe(CPUArchState *cpu_env, abi_long arg1,
> + abi_long arg2, abi_long arg3,
> + abi_long arg4, abi_long arg5)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct riscv_hwprobe *host_pairs;
> +
> + /* flags must be 0 */
> + if (arg5 != 0) {
> + return -TARGET_EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* check cpu_set */
> + if (arg3 != 0) {
> + ret = cpu_set_valid(arg3, arg4);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> + } else if (arg4 != 0) {
> + return -TARGET_EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* no pairs */
> + if (arg2 == 0) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + host_pairs = lock_user(VERIFY_WRITE, arg1,
> + sizeof(*host_pairs) * (size_t)arg2, 0);
> + if (host_pairs == NULL) {
> + return -TARGET_EFAULT;
> + }
> + risc_hwprobe_fill_pairs(cpu_env, host_pairs, arg2);
> + unlock_user(host_pairs, arg1, sizeof(*host_pairs) * (size_t)arg2);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* TARGET_NR_riscv_hwprobe */
> +
> #if defined(TARGET_NR_pivot_root) && defined(__NR_pivot_root)
> _syscall2(int, pivot_root, const char *, new_root, const char *, put_old)
> #endif
> @@ -13571,6 +13712,11 @@ static abi_long do_syscall1(CPUArchState *cpu_env, int num, abi_long arg1,
> return ret;
> #endif
>
> +#if defined(TARGET_NR_riscv_hwprobe)
> + case TARGET_NR_riscv_hwprobe:
> + return do_riscv_hwprobe(cpu_env, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5);
> +#endif
> +
> default:
> qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "Unsupported syscall: %d\n", num);
> return -TARGET_ENOSYS;
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-23 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-19 8:24 [PATCH] linux-user/riscv: Add syscall riscv_hwprobe Robbin Ehn
2023-06-23 2:24 ` Alistair Francis [this message]
2023-06-27 12:35 ` Robbin Ehn
2023-07-03 2:51 ` Alistair Francis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKmqyKNpE7gCMXqWnxCp58v+aXb=hWswniOTthM7joL+E+1Q_A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=alistair23@gmail.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
--cc=rehn@rivosinc.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).