qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>
To: Nikita Novikov <n.novikov@syntacore.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org,
	 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
	 Weiwei Li <liwei1518@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>,
	 Liu Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hw/intc/riscv_aplic: Expand inactive source handling for AIA target[i]
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 10:55:31 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKmqyKPDBx-xe4HHgySVM+4hRxXUUibOFeb1qBck2O28q8JGwg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251029-n-novikov-aplic_aia_ro-v1-1-39fec74c918a@syntacore.com>

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 5:19 PM Nikita Novikov <n.novikov@syntacore.com> wrote:
>
> According to the RISC-V AIA v1.0, section 4.5.2 ("Source configurations"),
> register target[i] shall be read-only zero when interrupt source i is inactive
> in this domain. A source is inactive if it is delegated to a child domain or
> its source mode is INACTIVE.
>
> The previous implementation only checked SM == INACTIVE. This patch adds
> full compliance:
> - Return zero on read if D == 1 or SM == INACTIVE
> - Ignore writes in both cases
>
> Fixes: b6f1244678 ("intc/riscv_aplic: Fix target register read when source is inactive")
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Novikov <n.novikov@syntacore.com>

Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Alistair

> ---
>  hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c b/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c
> index a2041e702245211ba3bcf4334301d7c86272e36f..8c3b16074cd3ca1bc3004cfaaa13f34b8860bd48 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c
> @@ -193,6 +193,26 @@ void riscv_aplic_set_kvm_msicfgaddr(RISCVAPLICState *aplic, hwaddr addr)
>  #endif
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * APLIC target[i] must be read-only zero if the source i is inactive
> + * in this domain (delegated or SM == INACTIVE)
> + */
> +static inline bool riscv_aplic_source_active(RISCVAPLICState *aplic,
> +                                             uint32_t irq)
> +{
> +    uint32_t sc, sm;
> +
> +    if ((irq == 0) || (aplic->num_irqs <= irq)) {
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +    sc = aplic->sourcecfg[irq];
> +    if (sc & APLIC_SOURCECFG_D) {
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +    sm = sc & APLIC_SOURCECFG_SM_MASK;
> +    return sm != APLIC_SOURCECFG_SM_INACTIVE;
> +}
> +
>  static bool riscv_aplic_irq_rectified_val(RISCVAPLICState *aplic,
>                                            uint32_t irq)
>  {
> @@ -635,7 +655,7 @@ static void riscv_aplic_request(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
>
>  static uint64_t riscv_aplic_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size)
>  {
> -    uint32_t irq, word, idc, sm;
> +    uint32_t irq, word, idc;
>      RISCVAPLICState *aplic = opaque;
>
>      /* Reads must be 4 byte words */
> @@ -703,8 +723,7 @@ static uint64_t riscv_aplic_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size)
>      } else if ((APLIC_TARGET_BASE <= addr) &&
>              (addr < (APLIC_TARGET_BASE + (aplic->num_irqs - 1) * 4))) {
>          irq = ((addr - APLIC_TARGET_BASE) >> 2) + 1;
> -        sm = aplic->sourcecfg[irq] & APLIC_SOURCECFG_SM_MASK;
> -        if (sm == APLIC_SOURCECFG_SM_INACTIVE) {
> +        if (!riscv_aplic_source_active(aplic, irq)) {
>              return 0;
>          }
>          return aplic->target[irq];
> @@ -841,6 +860,9 @@ static void riscv_aplic_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t value,
>      } else if ((APLIC_TARGET_BASE <= addr) &&
>              (addr < (APLIC_TARGET_BASE + (aplic->num_irqs - 1) * 4))) {
>          irq = ((addr - APLIC_TARGET_BASE) >> 2) + 1;
> +        if (!riscv_aplic_source_active(aplic, irq)) {
> +            return;
> +        }
>          if (aplic->msimode) {
>              aplic->target[irq] = value;
>          } else {
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-12  0:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-29  7:17 [PATCH 0/2] hw/intc/riscv_aplic: Expand AIA target[i] source handling and refactor related code Nikita Novikov
2025-10-29  7:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] hw/intc/riscv_aplic: Expand inactive source handling for AIA target[i] Nikita Novikov
2025-10-30 13:19   ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-11-12  0:55   ` Alistair Francis [this message]
2025-10-29  7:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] hw/intc/riscv_aplic: Factor out source_active() and remove duplicate checks Nikita Novikov
2025-10-30 13:19   ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-11-12  0:57   ` Alistair Francis
2025-11-12  1:06 ` [PATCH 0/2] hw/intc/riscv_aplic: Expand AIA target[i] source handling and refactor related code Alistair Francis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKmqyKPDBx-xe4HHgySVM+4hRxXUUibOFeb1qBck2O28q8JGwg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=alistair23@gmail.com \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=dbarboza@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=liwei1518@gmail.com \
    --cc=n.novikov@syntacore.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
    --cc=zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).