Re: [PATCH 0/4] target/ppc: Use probe_access

[Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 4:09 PM Howard Spoelstra <hsp.cat7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As this patch set solved the performance issue and even led to the highest scores I ever saw on the benchmark tool I used, let me add a:
>

This makes my question to Richard more important:

Are other targets exposed to performance degradation, and why?

> Tested-by: Howard Spoelstra <hsp.cat7@gmail.com>
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:50 AM Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> The first two address the performance regression noticed
>> by Howard Spoelstra.  The last two are just something I
>> noticed at the same time.
>>
>>
>> r~
>>
>>
>> Richard Henderson (4):
>>   target/ppc: Use probe_access for LSW, STSW
>>   target/ppc: Use probe_access for LMW, STMW
>>   target/ppc: Remove redundant mask in DCBZ
>>   target/ppc: Use probe_write for DCBZ
>>
>>  target/ppc/mem_helper.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 162 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>