From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Ron Minnich <rminnich@sandia.gov>,
V9FS Developers <v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 08:49:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUJn4cV+o3scP1EzYS=JA--5KUXvjuxZDbsnhXra1vrwA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181229015453.GA6310@bombadil.infradead.org>
> On Dec 28, 2018, at 6:54 PM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 12:12:27AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 at 23:16, Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> wrot
>>> On Dec 28, 2018, at 4:18 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> The problem is that there is no 32-bit API in some cases
>>>> (unless I have misunderstood the kernel code) -- not all
>>>> host architectures implement compat syscalls or allow them
>>>> to be called from 64-bit processes or implement all the older
>>>> syscall variants that had smaller offets. If there was a guaranteed
>>>> "this syscall always exists and always gives me 32-bit offsets"
>>>> we could use it.
>>>
>>> The "32bitapi" mount option would use 32-bit hash for seekdir
>>> and telldir, regardless of what kernel API was used. That would
>>> just set the FMODE_32BITHASH flag in the file->f_mode for all files.
>>
>> A mount option wouldn't be much use to QEMU -- we can't tell
>> our users how to mount their filesystems, which they're
>> often doing lots of other things with besides running QEMU.
>> (Otherwise we could just tell them "don't use ext4", which
>> would also solve the problem :-)) We need something we can
>> use at the individual-syscall level.
>
> Could you use a prctl to set whether you were running in 32 or 64 bit
> mode? Or do you change which kind of task you're emulating too often
> to make this a good idea?
How would this work? We already have the separate
COMPAT_DEFINE_SYSCALL entries *and* in_compat_syscall(). Now we’d have
a third degree of freedom.
Either the arches people care about should add reasonable ways to
issue 32-bit syscalls from 64-bit mode or there should be an explicit
way to ask for the 32-bit directory offsets.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-29 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-27 17:18 [Qemu-devel] d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation Florian Weimer
2018-12-27 17:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-27 17:56 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-27 17:41 ` Peter Maydell
2018-12-28 0:23 ` Andreas Dilger
2018-12-28 11:18 ` Peter Maydell
2018-12-28 23:16 ` Andreas Dilger
2018-12-29 0:12 ` Peter Maydell
2018-12-29 1:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-29 16:49 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2018-12-30 13:59 ` Peter Maydell
2018-12-29 2:11 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-29 2:37 ` Dominique Martinet
2018-12-29 3:14 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-29 4:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [V9fs-developer] " Dominique Martinet
2018-12-27 17:58 ` [Qemu-devel] " Adhemerval Zanella
2018-12-27 18:09 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-28 11:53 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-12-28 11:56 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-28 12:01 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-28 12:21 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-12-31 17:03 ` Joseph Myers
2019-01-02 13:16 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-12-28 2:23 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-28 7:38 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-28 15:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALCETrUJn4cV+o3scP1EzYS=JA--5KUXvjuxZDbsnhXra1vrwA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rminnich@sandia.gov \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).