Hi Andrey, thank you for your answer.

I know I can work around this by specifying a numa node.

My question is though is the current behaviour considered to be a bug, or not. And if yes, when it is expected to get fixed.

Thanks,

Mikhail

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Andrey Korolyov <andrey@xdel.ru> wrote:

Please try to populate basic (single-node) NUMA topology to workaround
this (or specify numa node for dimm).