From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34869)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <xerox.time.tech@gmail.com>) id 1SDMHM-0005VQ-9S
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:49:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <xerox.time.tech@gmail.com>) id 1SDMHK-0007y8-M8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:49:07 -0400
Received: from mail-gy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:42717)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <xerox.time.tech@gmail.com>) id 1SDMHK-0007xw-Eh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:49:06 -0400
Received: by ghrr14 with SMTP id r14so2285493ghr.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:49:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CALKntY2AgLK1bzM+-_rdwRYJrbWxY1dP0PGY3OXds-JOCSYEyQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: [Qemu-devel] memory ordering emulation in qemu
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

I am wondering what the solution in qemu is if the guest architecture
has a stronger memory ordering requirement than the host archiecture ?
memory fences ?

Thanks

Xin