From: Ahmed Karaman <ahmedkhaledkaraman@gmail.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: "Lukáš Doktor" <ldoktor@redhat.com>,
"Aleksandar Markovic" <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [REPORT] [GSoC - TCG Continuous Benchmarking] [#2] Dissecting QEMU Into Three Main Parts
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 19:10:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALTWKrXDf5efimui3NAzXKBA91Qs-qbpAEqVbTuDpvTBfmdrGA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fta7fz3n.fsf@linaro.org>
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 10:45 AM Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
> Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Wednesday, July 1, 2020, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Ahmed Karaman <ahmedkhaledkaraman@gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 6:03 PM Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Assuming your test case is constant execution (i.e. runs the same each
> >> >> time) you could run in through a plugins build to extract the number of
> >> >> guest instructions, e.g.:
> >> >>
> >> >> ./aarch64-linux-user/qemu-aarch64 -plugin tests/plugin/libinsn.so -d
> >> plugin ./tests/tcg/aarch64-linux-user/sha1
> >> >> SHA1=15dd99a1991e0b3826fede3deffc1feba42278e6
> >> >> insns: 158603512
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Alex Bennée
> >> >
> >> > Hi Mr. Alex,
> >> > I've created a plugins build as you've said using "--enable-plugins"
> >> option.
> >> > I've searched for "libinsn.so" plugin that you've mentioned in your
> >> > command but it isn't in that path.
> >>
> >> make plugins
> >>
> >> and you should find them in tests/plugins/
> >>
> >>
> > Hi, both Alex and Ahmed,
> >
> > Ahmed showed me tonight the first results with number of guest
> > instructions. It was almost eye-opening to me. The thing is, by now, I had
> > only vague picture that, on average, "many" host instructions are generated
> > per one guest instruction. Now, I could see exact ratio for each target,
> > for a particular example.
> >
> > A question for Alex:
> >
> > - What would be the application of this new info? (Except that one has nice
> > feeling, like I do, of knowing the exact ratio host/guest instruction for a
> > particular scenario.)
>
> Well I think the total number of guest instructions is important because
> some architectures are more efficient than others and this will an
> impact on the total executed instructions.
>
> > I just have a feeling there is more significance of this new data that I
> > currently see. Could it be that it can be used in analysis of performance?
> > Or measuring quality of emulation (TCG operation)? But how exactly? What
> > conclusion could potentially be derived from knowing number of guest
> > instructions?
>
> Knowing the ratio (especially as it changes between workloads) means you
> can better pin point where the inefficiencies lie. You don't want to
> spend your time chasing down an inefficiency that is down to the guest
> compiler ;-)
>
> >
> > Sorry for a "stupid" question.
> >
> > Aleksandar
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> >
> >> > Are there any other options that I should configure my build with?
> >> > Thanks in advance.
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Ahmed Karaman
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alex Bennée
> >>
>
>
> --
> Alex Bennée
Thanks Mr. Alex for your help!
Regards,
Ahmed Karaman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-04 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-29 10:25 [REPORT] [GSoC - TCG Continuous Benchmarking] [#2] Dissecting QEMU Into Three Main Parts Ahmed Karaman
2020-06-29 10:40 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-06-29 14:26 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-06-29 16:03 ` Alex Bennée
2020-06-29 18:21 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-06-29 21:16 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-07-01 13:44 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-07-01 15:42 ` Alex Bennée
2020-07-01 17:47 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-07-03 22:46 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-07-04 8:45 ` Alex Bennée
2020-07-04 9:19 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-07-04 9:55 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-07-04 17:10 ` Ahmed Karaman [this message]
2020-06-30 4:33 ` Lukáš Doktor
2020-06-30 7:18 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-06-30 8:58 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-06-30 12:46 ` Lukáš Doktor
2020-06-30 19:14 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-06-30 9:41 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-06-30 12:58 ` Lukáš Doktor
2020-06-30 5:59 ` 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo)
2020-06-30 7:29 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-06-30 8:21 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-06-30 9:52 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-06-30 19:02 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-07-01 14:47 ` Ahmed Karaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALTWKrXDf5efimui3NAzXKBA91Qs-qbpAEqVbTuDpvTBfmdrGA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ahmedkhaledkaraman@gmail.com \
--cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=ldoktor@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).