From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAvbx-0000ua-Pl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 03:42:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAvbu-0000Mp-L1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 03:42:13 -0400 Received: from mail-yk0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:35390) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAvbu-0000MZ-H5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 03:42:10 -0400 Received: by ykdy1 with SMTP id y1so89664736ykd.2 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:42:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <006e01d0b55c$dac86810$90593830$@samsung.com> References: <7301d5cb99fe7d96090333fc697c8b1b2d6514a6.1435844519.git.p.fedin@samsung.com> <20150702142516.GG1814@redhat.com> <02da01d0b4d5$f68a31f0$e39e95d0$@samsung.com> <02e901d0b4dc$12e3d3f0$38ab7bd0$@samsung.com> <006e01d0b55c$dac86810$90593830$@samsung.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:42:09 +0200 Message-ID: From: Christoffer Dall Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/9] Add virt-v3 machine that uses GIC-500 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Pavel Fedin Cc: Peter Maydell , Eric Auger , Shlomo Pongratz , Shlomo Pongratz , QEMU Developers On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hi! > >> I think you should leave out the software emulation part for this >> series and let's concentrate on getting this in first. > > Ok. > >> Also, you should make sure you have an agreement with Shlomo about >> taking over his patches before doing so (maybe you are already?). > > Shlomo has posted his work here, doesn't this automatically mean that he is sharing it with the community? Additionally, i do not drop his authorship. > Well, it can become a little messy for everyone if Shlomo is working on refactoring and respinning his patches, and meanwhile new versions of his patches go out embedded as part of another patch set. It's not exactly harmful, but usually doesn't happen without prior agreement amongst the involved parties, I would say. -Christoffer