From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHoKR-0004AM-06 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:25:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHoKP-0002mN-OR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:25:06 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]:36394) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHoKP-0002m7-G1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:25:05 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id p10so15941172qke.3 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 01:25:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <79f99759-db54-605b-0c42-edb5c26c8ad5@redhat.com> References: <79f99759-db54-605b-0c42-edb5c26c8ad5@redhat.com> From: Christoffer Dall Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:25:04 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] vITS support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Auger Eric Cc: Pavel Fedin , QEMU Developers , Diana Craciun , Shlomo Pongratz , Shlomo Pongratz , Peter Maydell , Andrew Jones On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Auger Eric wrote: > Dear all, > > On 24/11/2015 11:13, Pavel Fedin wrote: >> This series introduces support for in-kernel GICv3 ITS emulation. >> It is based on kernel API which is not released yet, therefore i post >> it as an RFC. >> >> Kernel patch sets which implement this functionality are: >> - [PATCH v3 00/16] KVM: arm64: GICv3 ITS emulation >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg121878.html >> - [PATCH v3 0/7] KVM: arm/arm64: gsi routing support >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg119567.html > > For testing KVM/ARM gsi routing and KVM ARM PCIe/MSI passthrough with > GICv3 ITS I intend to work on the respin of this series. I now have > access to a host featuring GICv3 ITS. Does anyone currently work on this > topic or intend to do so in short term or can I proceed? > Linaro is not working on this feature yet, and we would be happy to see you pick up this work. Thanks, -Christoffer