From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49600)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gardask@gmail.com>) id 1ZKQcb-0001LD-AO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:38:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gardask@gmail.com>) id 1ZKQcY-000262-PW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:38:09 -0400
Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e]:34905)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gardask@gmail.com>) id 1ZKQcY-00025w-Jx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:38:06 -0400
Received: by obbop1 with SMTP id op1so5947212obb.2
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 05:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMO55fmbRSyhLbFKPiyH9RWH3GszNCsAj4nePYSTm2Tt5DhdEA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <55B734A7.8040108@gmx.net>
	<CAMO55fmd4YMCk-BMBE5PjsBzUAiggo0Op_6=epwfM8VQJPksCA@mail.gmail.com>
	<55B8B122.7020406@gmx.net>
	<CAMO55fmbRSyhLbFKPiyH9RWH3GszNCsAj4nePYSTm2Tt5DhdEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:38:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMO55fnsvA9Fi7jBvS_mVNSR-mhPho_WrgORiY10cFtr+1dcWg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Karel Gardas <gardask@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Debian 7.8.0 SPARC64 on qemu - anything i can do
 to speedup the emulation?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Dennis Luehring <dl.soluz@gmx.net>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

aarch64 booted, this is ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS, LSB:

ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ file /bin//bash
/bin//bash: ELF 64-bit LSB  executable, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV),
dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 3.7.0,
BuildID[sha1]=36b671892d00161eaeb9f602049f9ce830e9056e, stripped
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
Processor    : AArch64 Processor rev 0 (aarch64)
processor    : 0
Features    : fp asimd evtstrm
CPU implementer    : 0x41
CPU architecture: AArch64
CPU variant    : 0x1
CPU part    : 0xd07
CPU revision    : 0

Hardware    : linux,dummy-virt

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Karel Gardas <gardask@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Dennis Luehring <dl.soluz@gmx.net> wrote:
>> Am 29.07.2015 um 11:17 schrieb Karel Gardas:
>>>
>>> What was interesting was that nbench2 was comparable on aarch64
>>
>>
>> was aarch64 a little or big-endian system, with unaligned accesses possible?
>
> This was Ubuntu with Linux kernel 3.13 so I guess little and unaligned
> possible to make least pain for developers. -- but I'm just guessing
> since I can't boot that now, it was always a little bit tricky to boot
> that btw. Once it boots, tell me how to find the asnwers to your
> questions. Will dmesg do or cat /proc/cpuinfo or just file /bin/bash?