From: Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>
To: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
qemu-block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>,
edgar.kaziakhmedov@virtuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Change in qemu 2.12 causes qemu-img convert to NBD to write more data
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 16:56:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMRbyyuFGVtNWF9LKoi0n6_r5Gr4j8LetbAMd0L_5cKMif9LjQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181107143628.GG8125@redhat.com>
Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 4:36 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> Another thing I tried was to change the NBD server (nbdkit) so that it
> doesn't advertise zero support to the client:
>
> $ nbdkit --filter=log --filter=nozero memory size=6G logfile=/tmp/log \
> --run './qemu-img convert ./fedora-28.img -n $nbd'
> $ grep '\.\.\.$' /tmp/log | sed 's/.*\([A-Z][a-z]*\).*/\1/' | uniq -c
> 2154 Write
>
> Not surprisingly no zero commands are issued. The size of the write
> commands is very uneven -- it appears to be send one command per block
> of zeroes or data.
>
> Nir: If we could get information from imageio about whether zeroing is
> implemented efficiently or not by the backend, we could change
> virt-v2v / nbdkit to advertise this back to qemu.
>
There is no way to detect the capability, ioctl(BLKZEROOUT) always
succeeds, falling back to manual zeroing in the kernel silently
Even if we could, sending zero on the wire from qemu may be even
slower, and it looks like qemu send even more requests in this case
(2154 vs ~1300).
Looks like this optimization in qemu side leads to worse performance,
so it should not be enabled by default.
Nir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-07 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-07 12:13 [Qemu-devel] Change in qemu 2.12 causes qemu-img convert to NBD to write more data Richard W.M. Jones
2018-11-07 14:36 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2018-11-07 14:56 ` Nir Soffer [this message]
2018-11-07 15:02 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2018-11-07 17:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Kevin Wolf
2018-11-07 17:55 ` Nir Soffer
2018-11-11 16:11 ` Nir Soffer
2018-11-15 22:27 ` Nir Soffer
2018-11-16 15:26 ` Kevin Wolf
2018-11-17 20:59 ` Nir Soffer
2018-11-17 21:13 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2018-11-18 7:24 ` Nir Soffer
2018-11-19 11:50 ` Kevin Wolf
2018-11-07 16:42 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Blake
2018-11-11 15:25 ` Nir Soffer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMRbyyuFGVtNWF9LKoi0n6_r5Gr4j8LetbAMd0L_5cKMif9LjQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=nsoffer@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=edgar.kaziakhmedov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).