From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44253) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Szeh7-00026L-CM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:11:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Szeh6-00035L-H7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:11:21 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.213.45]:45840) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Szeh6-00033Y-CV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:11:20 -0400 Received: by yhpp34 with SMTP id p34so1099709yhp.4 for ; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:11:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 22:11:19 -0400 Message-ID: From: Steven Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [Qemu-devel] Is the return address of get_page_addr_code guest physical address? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, The function definition has a return address type tb_page_addr_t. tb_page_addr_t get_page_addr_code(CPUArchState *env1, target_ulong addr) I am wondering is this address the guest physical address or the host virtual address. If it it is the guest physical address, why does Qemu waste guest physical space to store these address for tb? Thanks. Steven