From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@gmail.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC uncompiled PATCH] cocoa: run qemu_init in the main thread
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 01:41:44 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMVc7JVZSTpD5VL1Ls8CcWZsoEMMzsZsGApZ+tNkuFhMc8_+cA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8h0E5i=iJswVwC+v_=vs_u92-s90wMgq_C5ZjSTsrZSw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:35 AM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 at 16:27, Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:14 AM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > The main benefit of Paolo's suggestion from my point of view is
> > > that it entirely eliminates the odd situation where cocoa.m wants to
> > > make calls back into QEMU code where it does not itself hold
> > > the iothread lock in the current thread, but instead knows that
> > > some other thread does and is waiting for it. Instead we end up
> > > with a much more straightforward situation of "every time we
> > > call into QEMU code we hold the iothread lock directly ourselves".
>
> > The current cocoa.m somehows calls back into QEMU code in main, but
> > that is not necessary as demonstrated in:
> > https://patchew.org/QEMU/20220307134946.61407-1-akihiko.odaki@gmail.com/
> >
> > With the code is moved, it becomes only a difference of the place
> > where the code without iothread is located, in main or in
> > [-QemuCocoaAppController applicationDidFinishLaunching:].
>
> That series doesn't remove the general design that has quite a bit
> of "we know some other thread holds the lock and waits for us" code.
Well, I don't think so. main no longer calls back QEMU code (and it
should never do so in my opinion).
> It also gives us the opposite problem that we're now calling a lot
> of Cocoa APIs from something other than the main Cocoa thread.
Basically NSView is the only thing prohibited from calling from
another thread so it shouldn't be a problem.
Regards,
Akihiko Odaki
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-07 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-07 15:10 [RFC uncompiled PATCH] cocoa: run qemu_init in the main thread Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-07 15:34 ` Akihiko Odaki
2022-03-07 16:14 ` Peter Maydell
2022-03-07 16:27 ` Akihiko Odaki
2022-03-07 16:35 ` Peter Maydell
2022-03-07 16:41 ` Akihiko Odaki [this message]
2022-03-07 17:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-07 19:25 ` Akihiko Odaki
2022-03-07 16:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-07 17:03 ` Akihiko Odaki
2022-03-07 17:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-16 16:02 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMVc7JVZSTpD5VL1Ls8CcWZsoEMMzsZsGApZ+tNkuFhMc8_+cA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=akihiko.odaki@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).