From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: do setrlimit selectively
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 15:02:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMo8Bf+3gws2Sa24xMfVsAQ_PaZVqKPbpqpySAAHrdkvnF-erw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-AyrFVYWkM+_aBQ8eXH-03UZfgiHrB37v=-iM+A=70DA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 4 September 2018 at 22:00, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> When running 32-bit guest on 64-bit host setrlimit guest calls that
>> affect memory resources (RLIMIT_{AS,DATA,STACK}) don't always make sense
>> as is. They may result in QEMU lockup because mprotect call in
>> page_unprotect would fail with ENOMEM error code, causing infinite loop
>> of SIGSEGV. E.g. it happens when running libstdc++ testsuite for xtensa
>> target on x86_64 host.
>>
>> Don't call host setrlimit for memory-related resources when running
>> 32-bit guest on 64-bit host.
>
> I think the issue here is not related to 32-on-64 but to the fact
> that we just pass through the memory rlimits. What we should ideally
> be doing is tracking the actual guest memory allocations sufficiently
> that we can then apply the rlimits at the QEMU level, so that guest
> allocations that breach limits can be failed, without ever causing
> QEMU's own alloactions to fail.
In a sense we do it by limiting 32-bit guest to 32 or less bits of the address
space, that's why it should be rather safe to just ignore setrlimit calls in
32-on-64 case.
--
Thanks.
-- Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-04 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-04 21:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: do setrlimit selectively Max Filippov
2018-09-04 21:13 ` Peter Maydell
2018-09-04 22:02 ` Max Filippov [this message]
2018-09-04 22:10 ` Peter Maydell
2018-09-04 22:26 ` Max Filippov
2018-09-04 22:55 ` Peter Maydell
2018-09-05 0:08 ` Max Filippov
2018-09-05 1:40 ` Peter Maydell
2018-09-05 1:51 ` Max Filippov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMo8Bf+3gws2Sa24xMfVsAQ_PaZVqKPbpqpySAAHrdkvnF-erw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).