From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
To: 陳韋任 <chenwj@iis.sinica.edu.tw>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] The reason behind block linking constraint?
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:31:25 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMo8BfLgV6-FPvcUPsyZLswcE2sjHGoLL6QrepvV9sGv3fvLPA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110818063338.GA69924@cs.nctu.edu.tw>
> Hi, all
>
> I am trying to figure out why QEMU put some constraints on block
> linking (chaining). Take x86 as an example, there are two places
> put constraints on block linking, gen_goto_tb and cpu_exec.
>
> ----------------- gen_goto_tb (target-i386/translate.c) ---------------
> /* NOTE: we handle the case where the TB spans two pages here */
> if ((pc & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == (tb->pc & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) ||
> (pc & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == ((s->pc - 1) & TARGET_PAGE_MASK)) {
> /* jump to same page: we can use a direct jump */
> tcg_gen_goto_tb(tb_num);
> gen_jmp_im(eip);
> tcg_gen_exit_tb((tcg_target_long)tb + tb_num);
> } else {
> /* jump to another page: currently not optimized */
> gen_jmp_im(eip);
> gen_eob(s);
> }
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ----------------------- cpu_exec (cpu-exec.c) -------------------------
> /* see if we can patch the calling TB. When the TB
> spans two pages, we cannot safely do a direct
> jump. */
> if (next_tb != 0 && tb->page_addr[1] == -1) {
> tb_add_jump((TranslationBlock *)(next_tb & ~3), next_tb & 3, tb);
> }
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Is it just because we cannot optimize block linking which crosses page
> boundary, or there are some correctness/safety issues should be considered?
If we link a TB with another TB from the different page, then the
second TB may disappear when the memory mapping changes and the
subsequent direct jump from the first TB will crash qemu.
I guess that this usually does not happen in usermode, because the
guest would not modify executable code memory mapping. However I
suppose that this is also possible.
--
Thanks.
-- Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-18 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-18 6:33 [Qemu-devel] The reason behind block linking constraint? 陳韋任
2011-08-18 9:31 ` Max Filippov [this message]
2011-08-18 9:39 ` 陳韋任
2011-08-18 10:04 ` Max Filippov
2011-09-24 7:00 ` 陳韋任
2011-09-25 21:47 ` Max Filippov
2011-09-26 10:49 ` 陳韋任
2011-09-26 11:41 ` Max Filippov
2011-09-27 2:40 ` 陳韋任
2011-08-20 20:54 ` Rob Landley
2011-09-27 3:13 ` 陳韋任
2011-09-27 13:27 ` Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMo8BfLgV6-FPvcUPsyZLswcE2sjHGoLL6QrepvV9sGv3fvLPA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=chenwj@iis.sinica.edu.tw \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).