qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
To: 陳韋任 <chenwj@iis.sinica.edu.tw>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] The reason behind block linking constraint?
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:31:25 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMo8BfLgV6-FPvcUPsyZLswcE2sjHGoLL6QrepvV9sGv3fvLPA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110818063338.GA69924@cs.nctu.edu.tw>

> Hi, all
>
>  I am trying to figure out why QEMU put some constraints on block
> linking (chaining). Take x86 as an example, there are two places
> put constraints on block linking, gen_goto_tb and cpu_exec.
>
> ----------------- gen_goto_tb (target-i386/translate.c) ---------------
>  /* NOTE: we handle the case where the TB spans two pages here */
>  if ((pc & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == (tb->pc & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) ||
>      (pc & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == ((s->pc - 1) & TARGET_PAGE_MASK))  {
>      /* jump to same page: we can use a direct jump */
>      tcg_gen_goto_tb(tb_num);
>      gen_jmp_im(eip);
>      tcg_gen_exit_tb((tcg_target_long)tb + tb_num);
>  } else {
>      /* jump to another page: currently not optimized */
>      gen_jmp_im(eip);
>      gen_eob(s);
>  }
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ----------------------- cpu_exec (cpu-exec.c) -------------------------
>  /* see if we can patch the calling TB. When the TB
>     spans two pages, we cannot safely do a direct
>     jump. */
>  if (next_tb != 0 && tb->page_addr[1] == -1) {
>      tb_add_jump((TranslationBlock *)(next_tb & ~3), next_tb & 3, tb);
>  }
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  Is it just because we cannot optimize block linking which crosses page
> boundary, or there are some correctness/safety issues should be considered?

If we link a TB with another TB from the different page, then the
second TB may disappear when the memory mapping changes and the
subsequent direct jump from the first TB will crash qemu.

I guess that this usually does not happen in usermode, because the
guest would not modify executable code memory mapping. However I
suppose that this is also possible.

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-18  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-18  6:33 [Qemu-devel] The reason behind block linking constraint? 陳韋任
2011-08-18  9:31 ` Max Filippov [this message]
2011-08-18  9:39   ` 陳韋任
2011-08-18 10:04     ` Max Filippov
2011-09-24  7:00       ` 陳韋任
2011-09-25 21:47         ` Max Filippov
2011-09-26 10:49           ` 陳韋任
2011-09-26 11:41             ` Max Filippov
2011-09-27  2:40               ` 陳韋任
2011-08-20 20:54   ` Rob Landley
2011-09-27  3:13     ` 陳韋任
2011-09-27 13:27       ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMo8BfLgV6-FPvcUPsyZLswcE2sjHGoLL6QrepvV9sGv3fvLPA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=chenwj@iis.sinica.edu.tw \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).