From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51468) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1xa4-0000eb-Pi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 13:17:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1xa4-0007E5-5H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 13:17:20 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f182.google.com ([209.85.160.182]:34057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1xa4-0007Dl-0u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 13:17:20 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f182.google.com with SMTP id x20so584207qto.1 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 10:17:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3246431b-8d6e-f2bc-e0f0-99d80384d97b@redhat.com> <87r2bigarf.fsf@zen.linaroharston> <62408d6c-5a61-ffb2-f810-6ef36703b277@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <62408d6c-5a61-ffb2-f810-6ef36703b277@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYy1BbmRyw6kgTHVyZWF1?= Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 19:17:08 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] converting build system to Meson? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Peter Maydell , =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= , QEMU Developers , Thomas Huth , Richard Henderson Hi On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:13 PM Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 07/03/19 14:09, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 12:56, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> In any case, this wouldn't change; as you suggest below, configure could > >> remain as a front-end (well, in-srcdir builds are not supported by > >> Meson, so "../configure && ninja" perhaps). > > > > As an aside, it might be a nice idea to drop the in-srcdir > > build altogether for QEMU anyway -- it's not really a very > > good idea and it means our build system has to cope with two > > different ways of working to no particularly useful end. > > I was actually going to propose that, but I was afraid of throwing two > bombs in the same day. :) As someone who has also been annoyed having to support in-tree and out-of-tree, I support that move. I used to be a pretty happy use of in-tree builds, but out-of-tree his generally equally convenient. Who is volunteering to do patches to deprecate the support? warning in 4.0, and error in 4.1? thanks