From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49605)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>) id 1UzVEC-0004Es-4Z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:09:26 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>) id 1UzVEA-0004jW-R0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:09:24 -0400
Received: from mail-pb0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::233]:49516)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>) id 1UzVEA-0004jS-KM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:09:22 -0400
Received: by mail-pb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id um15so2111379pbc.38
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7C1EEB41-E2B3-4186-9188-379F02E76FF9@kamp.de>
References: <1373885375-13601-1-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de>
	<1373885375-13601-5-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de>
	<20130717084648.GD2458@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com>
	<51E66ACD.70706@redhat.com>
	<20130717102551.GF2458@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com>
	<CAN05THSiKdxONhHboG5a43KSeAZGnpq9=-T1YAKNipPQccDjww@mail.gmail.com>
	<51E6C5FC.1030304@redhat.com>
	<CAN05THSiLVt-cWq8x26Z6kdsAw0tvGf6zMDeJD8tVmZ=jCTSQQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<7C1EEB41-E2B3-4186-9188-379F02E76FF9@kamp.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:09:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CAN05THR2KMbUyUoUQS-xijTnsSG44HEtqZGLKbT2Fkvm6anc-A@mail.gmail.com>
From: ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] qemu-img: conditionally discard target
	on convert
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de> wrote:
> For Disks we always use read/write16 so i think we Should also use writesame16. Or not?

Sounds good.


>
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>
> Am 17.07.2013 um 18:31 schrieb ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Il 17/07/2013 17:54, ronnie sahlberg ha scritto:
>>>> I think it is reasonable to assume that IF LBPRZ==1 and IF it is an
>>>> "optimal unmap request" then the blocks will become unmapped and they
>>>> will read back as 0.
>>>
>>> Yes, but it is not reasonable to assume that bdrv_discard will only
>>> receive "optimal" requests.  Thus, using WRITE SAME for LBPRZ=1, and not
>>> exposing LBPRZ=1 if LBPWS=0 (may also use LBPWS10 depending on the
>>> capacity), is the safer thing to do.
>>>
>>> Paolo
>>
>> ACK.
>>
>> WRITESAME10/16 with UNMAP flag set is probably best.