From: ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI: improve the lba-out-of-range tests for read/write/verify
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:06:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN05THTu+3kALTgROah8bFM=8miwm6j-BOrOS2WV6+y_qEiGcw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFE771A.7030503@redhat.com>
Sorry, there is a bug in it.
Can you change it to :
|| r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba + 1) {
or else the last lba of the device will be flagged as out of range.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 12/07/2012 08:52, Ronnie Sahlberg ha scritto:
>> Improve the tests for the LBA to cover more cases, the new test looks like this
>> if (r->req.cmd.lba > r->req.cmd.lba + len
>> || r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>>
>> For the 16 byte opcodes, the lba is a uint64, so the first check is to make sure that we do not wrap.
>> For example if an opcode would specify the LBA:0xffffffffffffffff and LEN:2
>> then lba+len would wrap to 1.
>>
>> The second part of the test is to verify that ALL requested blocks are available, not just the first one.
>
> Fixed code style for || and applied to scsi-next.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Paolo
>
>> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> hw/scsi-disk.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi-disk.c
>> index b2f3c0c..40c05de 100644
>> --- a/hw/scsi-disk.c
>> +++ b/hw/scsi-disk.c
>> @@ -1558,7 +1558,8 @@ static int32_t scsi_send_command(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *buf)
>> if (r->req.cmd.buf[1] & 0xe0) {
>> goto fail;
>> }
>> - if (r->req.cmd.lba > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>> + if (r->req.cmd.lba > r->req.cmd.lba + len
>> + || r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>> goto illegal_lba;
>> }
>> r->sector = r->req.cmd.lba * (s->qdev.blocksize / 512);
>> @@ -1581,7 +1582,8 @@ static int32_t scsi_send_command(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *buf)
>> if (r->req.cmd.buf[1] & 0xe0) {
>> goto fail;
>> }
>> - if (r->req.cmd.lba > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>> + if (r->req.cmd.lba > r->req.cmd.lba + len
>> + || r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>> goto illegal_lba;
>> }
>> r->sector = r->req.cmd.lba * (s->qdev.blocksize / 512);
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-12 6:52 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI improved LBA-out-of-range checks Ronnie Sahlberg
2012-07-12 6:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI: improve the lba-out-of-range tests for read/write/verify Ronnie Sahlberg
2012-07-12 7:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-12 7:06 ` ronnie sahlberg [this message]
2012-07-12 7:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAN05THTu+3kALTgROah8bFM=8miwm6j-BOrOS2WV6+y_qEiGcw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).