From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To: Andrey Erokhin <language.lawyer@gmail.com>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] virtfs: 9p: local: add default uid and gid options
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 04:34:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANCZdfrkPrr-KQF800UVsQov8LpZte9x2ryRao7GGUyuxFwGeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c2d79567-6b6c-4222-b1df-550db57ad626@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1982 bytes --]
On Sat, Dec 6, 2025, 10:12 AM Andrey Erokhin <language.lawyer@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 03/12/2025 15:33, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Monday, 1 December 2025 19:00:53 CET Andrey Erokhin wrote:
> >> I was trying to boot from a directory tree owned by an ordinary user,
> >> and some daemons weren't happy about non-root ownership of some files
> >>
> >> Example use:
> >> -virtfs
> local,path=rootfs,mount_tag=root,security_model=mapped,uid=0,gid=0
> >>
> >> Works with any security_model
> >
> > First I thought do we really want to open that rabbit hole and add
> permission management to the CLI options? However I get why this might be
> useful for mapped[-*] security models.
> > But for passthrough it is not of any use, is it?
>
> Prolly none, just a side effect of how it's implemented.
> Can either make it an error when used with passthrough, or ignore them
> (use default -1 value) when copying options to 9p fs context (with or
> without a warning)
>
> > Also while it is very handy to have a short option name like "uid" and
> "gid", for the sake of long term progression and clarity an option name
> like "default-uid" would be more appropriate.
>
> Or rather default_uid, to match other options style? But uid/gid also
> kinda match fmode/dmode :\
>
FreeBSD has a mode where you can build the image where the files in the
filesystem are owned by the user with random permission bits, but the
actual owners / modes are in an mtree formatted file. The nopriv imagers
combine the two when making images. It would be nice to have p9 do a
simular mapping for the guest so I can boot test these images more directly
w/o the copyout to the "bootable image". The set the uid feature would
help, true, but leaves me wanting more.
Warner
> The patch is also missing the required documentation changes for these
> new options BTW.
>
> Haven’t added them yet, wasn’t sure there would be interest in this feature
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2711 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-07 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-01 18:00 [RFC PATCH] virtfs: 9p: local: add default uid and gid options Andrey Erokhin
2025-12-03 10:33 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2025-12-06 17:10 ` Andrey Erokhin
2025-12-07 11:34 ` Warner Losh [this message]
2025-12-09 10:21 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2025-12-09 10:38 ` Warner Losh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANCZdfrkPrr-KQF800UVsQov8LpZte9x2ryRao7GGUyuxFwGeA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=imp@bsdimp.com \
--cc=language.lawyer@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).