qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 858585 jemmy <jemmy858585@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
	Dave Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	Adi Dotan <adido@mellanox.com>, Gal Shachaf <galsha@mellanox.com>,
	Aviad Yehezkel <aviadye@mellanox.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Lidong Chen <lidongchen@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/6] migration: implement bi-directional RDMA QIOChannel
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 19:49:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOGPPbdx1EPXFUibshPG+ZfgJ38ALpX4xBi2fk2LqkaLjbA6Yw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOGPPbeVvm5OM+oNpYfYiAsNTK7bn7eFDgzyMuvm8YymM2sq_w@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:36 PM, 858585 jemmy <jemmy858585@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 05/05/2018 16:35, Lidong Chen wrote:
>>> @@ -2635,12 +2637,20 @@ static ssize_t qio_channel_rdma_writev(QIOChannel *ioc,
>>>  {
>>>      QIOChannelRDMA *rioc = QIO_CHANNEL_RDMA(ioc);
>>>      QEMUFile *f = rioc->file;
>>> -    RDMAContext *rdma = rioc->rdma;
>>> +    RDMAContext *rdma;
>>>      int ret;
>>>      ssize_t done = 0;
>>>      size_t i;
>>>      size_t len = 0;
>>>
>>> +    rcu_read_lock();
>>> +    rdma = atomic_rcu_read(&rioc->rdmaout);
>>> +
>>> +    if (!rdma) {
>>> +        rcu_read_unlock();
>>> +        return -EIO;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>>      CHECK_ERROR_STATE();
>>>
>>>      /*
>>
>> I am not sure I understand this.  It would probably be wrong to use the
>> output side from two threads at the same time, so why not use two mutexes?
>
> Two thread will not invoke qio_channel_rdma_writev at the same time.
> The source qemu, migration thread only use writev, and the return path
> thread only
> use readv.
> The destination qemu already have a mutex mis->rp_mutex to make sure
> not use writev
> at the same time.
>
> The rcu_read_lock is used to protect not use RDMAContext when another
> thread closes it.

Any suggestion?

>
>>
>> Also, who is calling qio_channel_rdma_close in such a way that another
>> thread is still using it?  Would it be possible to synchronize with the
>> other thread *before*, for example with qemu_thread_join?
>
> The MigrationState structure includes to_dst_file and from_dst_file
> QEMUFile, the two QEMUFile use the same QIOChannel.
> For example, if the return path thread call
> qemu_fclose(ms->rp_state.from_dst_file),
> It will also close the RDMAContext for ms->to_dst_file.
>
> For live migration, the source qemu invokes qemu_fclose in different
> threads include main thread, migration thread, return path thread.
>
> The destination qemu invokes qemu_fclose in main thread, listen thread and
> COLO incoming thread.
>
> I do not find an effective way to synchronize these threads.
>
> Thanks.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-21 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-05 14:35 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/6] Enable postcopy RDMA live migration Lidong Chen
2018-05-05 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/6] migration: disable RDMA WRITE after postcopy started Lidong Chen
2018-05-05 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/6] migration: create a dedicated connection for rdma return path Lidong Chen
2018-05-05 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/6] migration: remove unnecessary variables len in QIOChannelRDMA Lidong Chen
2018-05-08 14:19   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-05-09  1:28     ` 858585 jemmy
2018-05-05 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/6] migration: avoid concurrent invoke channel_close by different threads Lidong Chen
2018-05-05 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/6] migration: implement bi-directional RDMA QIOChannel Lidong Chen
2018-05-15 14:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-05-16  9:36     ` 858585 jemmy
2018-05-21 11:49       ` 858585 jemmy [this message]
2018-05-23  2:36         ` 858585 jemmy
2018-05-05 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/6] migration: Stop rdma yielding during incoming postcopy Lidong Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOGPPbdx1EPXFUibshPG+ZfgJ38ALpX4xBi2fk2LqkaLjbA6Yw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jemmy858585@gmail.com \
    --cc=adido@mellanox.com \
    --cc=aviadye@mellanox.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=galsha@mellanox.com \
    --cc=lidongchen@tencent.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).