From: 858585 jemmy <jemmy858585@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
Dave Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Adi Dotan <adido@mellanox.com>, Gal Shachaf <galsha@mellanox.com>,
Aviad Yehezkel <aviadye@mellanox.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Lidong Chen <lidongchen@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/6] migration: implement bi-directional RDMA QIOChannel
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 19:49:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOGPPbdx1EPXFUibshPG+ZfgJ38ALpX4xBi2fk2LqkaLjbA6Yw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOGPPbeVvm5OM+oNpYfYiAsNTK7bn7eFDgzyMuvm8YymM2sq_w@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:36 PM, 858585 jemmy <jemmy858585@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 05/05/2018 16:35, Lidong Chen wrote:
>>> @@ -2635,12 +2637,20 @@ static ssize_t qio_channel_rdma_writev(QIOChannel *ioc,
>>> {
>>> QIOChannelRDMA *rioc = QIO_CHANNEL_RDMA(ioc);
>>> QEMUFile *f = rioc->file;
>>> - RDMAContext *rdma = rioc->rdma;
>>> + RDMAContext *rdma;
>>> int ret;
>>> ssize_t done = 0;
>>> size_t i;
>>> size_t len = 0;
>>>
>>> + rcu_read_lock();
>>> + rdma = atomic_rcu_read(&rioc->rdmaout);
>>> +
>>> + if (!rdma) {
>>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>>> + return -EIO;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> CHECK_ERROR_STATE();
>>>
>>> /*
>>
>> I am not sure I understand this. It would probably be wrong to use the
>> output side from two threads at the same time, so why not use two mutexes?
>
> Two thread will not invoke qio_channel_rdma_writev at the same time.
> The source qemu, migration thread only use writev, and the return path
> thread only
> use readv.
> The destination qemu already have a mutex mis->rp_mutex to make sure
> not use writev
> at the same time.
>
> The rcu_read_lock is used to protect not use RDMAContext when another
> thread closes it.
Any suggestion?
>
>>
>> Also, who is calling qio_channel_rdma_close in such a way that another
>> thread is still using it? Would it be possible to synchronize with the
>> other thread *before*, for example with qemu_thread_join?
>
> The MigrationState structure includes to_dst_file and from_dst_file
> QEMUFile, the two QEMUFile use the same QIOChannel.
> For example, if the return path thread call
> qemu_fclose(ms->rp_state.from_dst_file),
> It will also close the RDMAContext for ms->to_dst_file.
>
> For live migration, the source qemu invokes qemu_fclose in different
> threads include main thread, migration thread, return path thread.
>
> The destination qemu invokes qemu_fclose in main thread, listen thread and
> COLO incoming thread.
>
> I do not find an effective way to synchronize these threads.
>
> Thanks.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-21 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-05 14:35 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/6] Enable postcopy RDMA live migration Lidong Chen
2018-05-05 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/6] migration: disable RDMA WRITE after postcopy started Lidong Chen
2018-05-05 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/6] migration: create a dedicated connection for rdma return path Lidong Chen
2018-05-05 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/6] migration: remove unnecessary variables len in QIOChannelRDMA Lidong Chen
2018-05-08 14:19 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-05-09 1:28 ` 858585 jemmy
2018-05-05 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/6] migration: avoid concurrent invoke channel_close by different threads Lidong Chen
2018-05-05 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/6] migration: implement bi-directional RDMA QIOChannel Lidong Chen
2018-05-15 14:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-05-16 9:36 ` 858585 jemmy
2018-05-21 11:49 ` 858585 jemmy [this message]
2018-05-23 2:36 ` 858585 jemmy
2018-05-05 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/6] migration: Stop rdma yielding during incoming postcopy Lidong Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOGPPbdx1EPXFUibshPG+ZfgJ38ALpX4xBi2fk2LqkaLjbA6Yw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jemmy858585@gmail.com \
--cc=adido@mellanox.com \
--cc=aviadye@mellanox.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=galsha@mellanox.com \
--cc=lidongchen@tencent.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).