From: Yongji Xie <elohimes@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Felipe Franciosi <felipe@nutanix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: notify virtqueue via host notifier when available
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:30:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAONzpcYQZ2zL4AvdXD6vbMCsfg72213S8wORSoPiAfQ9vCxxZQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021114017.26011-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 19:40, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Host notifiers are used in several cases:
> 1. Traditional ioeventfd where virtqueue notifications are handled in
> the main loop thread.
> 2. IOThreads (aio_handle_output) where virtqueue notifications are
> handled in an IOThread AioContext.
> 3. vhost where virtqueue notifications are handled by kernel vhost or
> a vhost-user device backend.
>
> Most virtqueue notifications from the guest use the ioeventfd mechanism,
> but there are corner cases where QEMU code calls virtio_queue_notify().
> This currently honors the host notifier for the IOThreads
> aio_handle_output case, but not for the vhost case. The result is that
> vhost does not receive virtqueue notifications from QEMU when
> virtio_queue_notify() is called.
>
> This patch extends virtio_queue_notify() to set the host notifier
> whenever it is enabled instead of calling the vq->(aio_)handle_output()
> function directly.
>
> This fixes the vhost case although it does add a trip through the
> eventfd for the traditional ioeventfd case. I don't think it's worth
> adding a fast path for the traditional ioeventfd case because calling
> virtio_queue_notify() is rare when ioeventfd is enabled.
>
> Reported-by: Felipe Franciosi <felipe@nutanix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
> Felipe and Yongji: Only tested with "make check". Please try
> vhost-user-scsi/blk and let us know if it fixes the issue.
>
I can see the vhost-user-blk issue is fixed by this patch after the
below patch applied:
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user-blk-pci.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user-blk-pci.c
index 1dc834a..a32a439 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user-blk-pci.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user-blk-pci.c
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static Property vhost_user_blk_pci_properties[] = {
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("class", VirtIOPCIProxy, class_code, 0),
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("vectors", VirtIOPCIProxy, nvectors,
DEV_NVECTORS_UNSPECIFIED),
+ DEFINE_PROP_BIT("ioeventfd", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags,
+ VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_IOEVENTFD_BIT, true),
DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
};
> include/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.h | 7 +++++++
> hw/virtio/virtio.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.h
> index 38c9399cd4..28ca51cb4c 100644
> --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.h
> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.h
> @@ -139,6 +139,13 @@ static inline VirtIODevice *virtio_bus_get_device(VirtioBusState *bus)
>
> /* Return whether the proxy allows ioeventfd. */
> bool virtio_bus_ioeventfd_enabled(VirtioBusState *bus);
> +
> +/* Return whether ioeventfd has been started. */
> +static inline bool virtio_bus_ioeventfd_started(VirtioBusState *bus)
> +{
> + return bus->ioeventfd_started;
> +}
> +
> /* Start the ioeventfd. */
> int virtio_bus_start_ioeventfd(VirtioBusState *bus);
> /* Stop the ioeventfd. */
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index 527df03bfd..abdcec00cd 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -1567,6 +1567,8 @@ static void virtio_queue_notify_vq(VirtQueue *vq)
>
> void virtio_queue_notify(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
> {
> + BusState *qbus = qdev_get_parent_bus(DEVICE(vdev));
> + VirtioBusState *vbus = VIRTIO_BUS(qbus);
> VirtQueue *vq = &vdev->vq[n];
>
> if (unlikely(!vq->vring.desc || vdev->broken)) {
> @@ -1574,7 +1576,7 @@ void virtio_queue_notify(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
> }
>
> trace_virtio_queue_notify(vdev, vq - vdev->vq, vq);
> - if (vq->handle_aio_output) {
> + if (virtio_bus_ioeventfd_started(vbus)) {
Need to check whether vq->host_notifier is valid or not here.
Otherwise, it could break the ctrl_vq in vhost_net device.
Thanks,
Yongji
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-24 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-21 11:40 [PATCH] virtio: notify virtqueue via host notifier when available Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-24 3:30 ` Yongji Xie [this message]
2019-11-05 12:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAONzpcYQZ2zL4AvdXD6vbMCsfg72213S8wORSoPiAfQ9vCxxZQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=elohimes@gmail.com \
--cc=felipe@nutanix.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).