Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0 0/6] vhost-user-blk: Add support for backend reconnecting

[Yongji Xie <elohimes@gmail.com>]

On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 at 05:23, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:33:54AM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 10:20, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 09:56:41AM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 22:45, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 02:35:46PM +0800, elohimes@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > From: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@baidu.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This patchset is aimed at supporting qemu to reconnect
> > > > > > vhost-user-blk backend after vhost-user-blk backend crash or
> > > > > > restart.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The patch 1 tries to implenment the sync connection for
> > > > > > "reconnect socket".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The patch 2 introduces a new message VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_INFLIGHT
> > > > > > to support offering shared memory to backend to record
> > > > > > its inflight I/O.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The patch 3,4 are the corresponding libvhost-user patches of
> > > > > > patch 2. Make libvhost-user support VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_INFLIGHT.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The patch 5 supports vhost-user-blk to reconnect backend when
> > > > > > connection closed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The patch 6 tells qemu that we support reconnecting now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To use it, we could start qemu with:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > qemu-system-x86_64 \
> > > > > >         -chardev socket,id=char0,path=/path/vhost.socket,reconnect=1,wait \
> > > > > >         -device vhost-user-blk-pci,chardev=char0 \
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and start vhost-user-blk backend with:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > vhost-user-blk -b /path/file -s /path/vhost.socket
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Then we can restart vhost-user-blk at any time during VM running.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Xie Yongji (6):
> > > > > >   char-socket: Enable "wait" option for client mode
> > > > > >   vhost-user: Add shared memory to record inflight I/O
> > > > > >   libvhost-user: Introduce vu_queue_map_desc()
> > > > > >   libvhost-user: Support recording inflight I/O in shared memory
> > > > > >   vhost-user-blk: Add support for reconnecting backend
> > > > > >   contrib/vhost-user-blk: enable inflight I/O recording
> > > > >
> > > > > What is missing in all this is documentation.
> > > > > Specifically docs/interop/vhost-user.txt.
> > > > >
> > > > > At a high level the design is IMO a good one.
> > > > >
> > > > > However I would prefer reading the protocol first before
> > > > > the code.
> > > > >
> > > > > So here's what I managed to figure out, and it matches
> > > > > how I imagined it would work when I was still
> > > > > thinking about out of order for net:
> > > > >
> > > > > - backend allocates memory to keep its stuff around
> > > > > - sends it to qemu so it can maintain it
> > > > > - gets it back on reconnect
> > > > >
> > > > > format and size etc are all up to the backend,
> > > > > a good implementation would probably implement some
> > > > > kind of versioning.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is this what this implements?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Definitely, yes. And the comments looks good to me. Qemu get size and
> > > > version from backend, then allocate memory and send it back with
> > > > version. Backend knows how to use the memory according to the version.
> > > > If we do that, should we allocate the memory per device rather than
> > > > per virtqueue?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Yongji
> > >
> > > It's up to you. Maybe both.
> > >
> >
> > OK. I think I may still keep it in virtqueue level in v2. Thank you.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yongji
>
> I'd actually add options for both, and backend can set size 0 if it
> wants to.
>
OK, let me try it in v2.

Thanks,
Yongji