From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59651) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFKek-0004p2-5M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:56:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFKej-0001t0-7m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:56:38 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-x241.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::241]:35162) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFKej-0001sp-2g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:56:37 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-x241.google.com with SMTP id u132so62975ita.0 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 05:56:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5e211649-ccf6-efd9-cabd-a346af7e501d@redhat.com> References: <1510801633-115970-1-git-send-email-eswierk@skyportsystems.com> <5e211649-ccf6-efd9-cabd-a346af7e501d@redhat.com> From: Ed Swierk Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 05:55:55 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] net: Transmit zero UDP checksum as 0xFFFF List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: Jason Wang , "Daniel P . Berrange" , Stefan Hajnoczi , Dmitry Fleytman , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > > On 11/15/2017 09:07 PM, Ed Swierk via Qemu-devel wrote: > > This part below... > > > > > v3: > > > > Leave net_tx_pkt_update_ip_checksums() alone since it's only computing > > a partial sum of the IP pseudo-header. > > > > Rename wrapper to net_checksum_finish_nozero() for clarity. > > > > v2: > > > > Add a wrapper net_checksum_finish_hdr() rather than duplicating the > > logic at every caller. > > ...through here, belongs... > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ed Swierk > > --- > > ...here, after the --- separator (you can have more than one ---; 'git > am' stops parsing at the first). It is data that is useful to > reviewers, but will be meaningless a year from now when browsing git > history (at which point we won't care how many revisions the patch went > through on the list, but only what was checked in). Thanks for the clue. I'll repost a corrected version. Maybe checkpatch.pl should squawk if it sees ^v[0-9]\+: before the first ---? --Ed