From: Vadim Galitsyn <vadim.galitsyn@profitbricks.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Mohammed Gamal <mohammed.gamal@profitbricks.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>,
Eduardo Otubo <eduardo.otubo@profitbricks.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] hmp, qmp: introduce memory-size-summary commands
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 18:20:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPHE7Npz7Ob7mAV6478qH2OP3OB9zAyhzs3C_TL5_WaC9TetaA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k23k39oq.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
Hi Guys,
Thank you for the feedback! Unfortunately, I am almost off for vacation and
will not be able to provide next patch in the following couple of weeks.
Nevertheless, will do so as soon as I return back.
I still have a question whether we need to provide NUMA information here?
>From my point of view it is a little bit out of scope of these commands
since it gives a bit more detailed information while the commands aimed to
give a short summary. I have a small patch which extends "info numa" with
hotplugged memory information per NUMA node. Maybe it is better to go this
way? I can include it into this patch series.
In the next patch (2 weeks later unfortunately) I will take into account
all the remaining points from this thread:
1. Turn into patch series by splitting HMP/QMP into separate patches;
2. Drop ballooning information;
3. Include "info numa" patch which extents output with hotplugged memory
info per NUMA node.
Thank you for the feedback once again,
Vadim
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
wrote:
> "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > * Markus Armbruster (armbru@redhat.com) wrote:
> >> Sorry for the late review, got a bit overwhelmed...
> >>
> >> Vadim Galitsyn <vadim.galitsyn@profitbricks.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > Commands above provide the following memory information in bytes:
> >> >
> >> > * base-memory - amount of unremovable memory specified
> >> > with '-m' option at the start of the QEMU process.
> >> >
> >> > * hotpluggable-memory - amount of memory that was hot-plugged.
> >> > If target does not have CONFIG_MEM_HOTPLUG enabled, no
> >> > value is reported.
> >> >
> >> > * balloon-actual-memory - size of the memory that remains
> >> > available to the guest after ballooning, as reported by the
> >> > guest. If the guest has not reported its memory, this value
> >> > equals to @base-memory + @hot-plug-memory. If ballooning
> >> > is not enabled, no value is reported.
> >> >
> >> > NOTE:
> >> >
> >> > Parameter @balloon-actual-memory reports the same as
> >> > "info balloon" command when ballooning is enabled. The idea
> >> > to have it in scope of this command(s) comes from
> >> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-07/
> msg01472.html.
> [...]
> >> > hmp-commands-info.hx | 17 ++++++++++++
> >> > hmp.c | 23
> ++++++++++++++++
> >> > hmp.h | 1 +
> >> > hw/mem/pc-dimm.c | 6 +++++
> >> > include/hw/mem/pc-dimm.h | 1 +
> >> > qapi-schema.json | 28
> +++++++++++++++++++
> >> > qmp.c | 31
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> > stubs/Makefile.objs | 2 +-
> >> > stubs/{qmp_pc_dimm_device_list.c => qmp_pc_dimm.c} | 5 ++++
> >> > 9 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> > rename stubs/{qmp_pc_dimm_device_list.c => qmp_pc_dimm.c} (60%)
> >>
> >> No test coverage?
> >>
> >> I prefer to add pairs of QMP / HMP commands in separate patches, QMP
> >> first, for easier review. This patch seems small enough to tolerate
> >> adding them in a single patch. But do consider splitting if you have to
> >> respin.
> >
> > The HMP tester scans all 'info' commands so it's not needed for the HMP
> > side.
>
> Correct. I want a similar test for QMP, but I'm not asking Vadim to
> provide it :)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-07 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-30 13:31 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] hmp, qmp: introduce memory-size-summary commands Vadim Galitsyn
2017-06-30 13:31 ` Vadim Galitsyn
2017-07-07 7:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-07-07 7:43 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-07-07 8:06 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-07-07 8:58 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-07-07 16:20 ` Vadim Galitsyn [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-07-28 12:10 Vadim Galitsyn
2017-08-14 14:32 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-08-15 7:54 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPHE7Npz7Ob7mAV6478qH2OP3OB9zAyhzs3C_TL5_WaC9TetaA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vadim.galitsyn@profitbricks.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo.otubo@profitbricks.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mohammed.gamal@profitbricks.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).