Re: [PATCH 0/4] target/ppc: TCG SMT support for spapr

["Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>]

On Wed Jun 7, 2023 at 12:09 AM AEST, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 6/5/23 13:23, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Previous RFC here
> > 
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-ppc/2023-05/msg00453.html
> > 
> > This series drops patch 1 from the previous, which is more of
> > a standalone bugfix.
> > 
> > Also accounted for Cedric's comments, except a nicer way to
> > set cpu_index vs PIR/TIR SPRs, which is not quite trivial.
> > 
> > This limits support for SMT to POWER8 and newer. It is also
> > incompatible with nested-HV so that is checked for too.
> > 
> > Iterating CPUs to find siblings for now I kept because similar
> > loops exist in a few places, and it is not conceptually
> > difficult for SMT, just fiddly code to improve. For now it
> > should not be much performane concern.
> > 
> > I removed hypervisor msgsnd support from patch 3, which is not
> > required for spapr and added significantly to the patch.
> > 
> > For now nobody has objected to the way shared SPR access is
> > handled (serialised with TCG atomics support) so we'll keep
> > going with it.
>
> Cc:ing more people for possible feedback.

Not much feedback so I'll plan to go with this.

A more performant implementation might try to synchronize
threads at the register level rather than serialize everything,
but SMT shared registers are not too performance critical so
this should do for now.

Thanks,
Nick