qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Harsh Prateek Bora" <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>, <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>
Cc: <clegoate@redhat.com>, <mikey@neuling.org>,
	<amachhiw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>,
	<sbhat@linux.ibm.com>, <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
	<qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/15] spapr: nested: Extend nested_ppc_state for nested PAPR API
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 19:59:01 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CZFRUDQEDISV.EXR9E2TZQDP4@wheely> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240220083609.748325-10-harshpb@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue Feb 20, 2024 at 6:36 PM AEST, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
> Currently, nested_ppc_state stores a certain set of registers and works
> with nested_[load|save]_state() for state transfer as reqd for nested-hv API.
> Extending these with additional registers state as reqd for nested PAPR API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
> Suggested-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h |  49 ++++++++++++++++
>  target/ppc/cpu.h              |   2 +
>  hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c         | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 157 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h
> index 24e87bca08..a3b61eb79a 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ typedef struct SpaprMachineStateNested {
>      uint64_t ptcr;
>      uint8_t api;
>  #define NESTED_API_KVM_HV  1
> +#define NESTED_API_PAPR    2
>      bool capabilities_set;
>      uint32_t pvr_base;
>      GHashTable *guests;
> @@ -123,6 +124,54 @@ struct nested_ppc_state {
>      int64_t tb_offset;
>      /* Nested PAPR API */
>      uint64_t pvr;
> +    uint64_t amor;
> +    uint64_t dawr0;
> +    uint64_t dawrx0;
> +    uint64_t ciabr;
> +    uint64_t purr;
> +    uint64_t spurr;
> +    uint64_t ic;
> +    uint64_t vtb;
> +    uint64_t hdar;
> +    uint64_t hdsisr;
> +    uint64_t heir;
> +    uint64_t asdr;
> +    uint64_t dawr1;
> +    uint64_t dawrx1;
> +    uint64_t dexcr;
> +    uint64_t hdexcr;
> +    uint64_t hashkeyr;
> +    uint64_t hashpkeyr;
> +    ppc_vsr_t vsr[64] QEMU_ALIGNED(16);
> +    uint64_t ebbhr;
> +    uint64_t tar;
> +    uint64_t ebbrr;
> +    uint64_t bescr;
> +    uint64_t iamr;
> +    uint64_t amr;
> +    uint64_t uamor;
> +    uint64_t dscr;
> +    uint64_t fscr;
> +    uint64_t pspb;
> +    uint64_t ctrl;
> +    uint64_t vrsave;
> +    uint64_t dar;
> +    uint64_t dsisr;
> +    uint64_t pmc1;
> +    uint64_t pmc2;
> +    uint64_t pmc3;
> +    uint64_t pmc4;
> +    uint64_t pmc5;
> +    uint64_t pmc6;
> +    uint64_t mmcr0;
> +    uint64_t mmcr1;
> +    uint64_t mmcr2;
> +    uint64_t mmcra;
> +    uint64_t sdar;
> +    uint64_t siar;
> +    uint64_t sier;
> +    uint32_t vscr;
> +    uint64_t fpscr;
>  };
>  
>  typedef struct SpaprMachineStateNestedGuestVcpu {
> diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu.h b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> index a44de22ca4..11205bb9e3 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> @@ -1737,9 +1737,11 @@ void ppc_compat_add_property(Object *obj, const char *name,
>  #define SPR_PSPB              (0x09F)
>  #define SPR_DPDES             (0x0B0)
>  #define SPR_DAWR0             (0x0B4)
> +#define SPR_DAWR1             (0x0B5)
>  #define SPR_RPR               (0x0BA)
>  #define SPR_CIABR             (0x0BB)
>  #define SPR_DAWRX0            (0x0BC)
> +#define SPR_DAWRX1            (0x0BD)
>  #define SPR_HFSCR             (0x0BE)
>  #define SPR_VRSAVE            (0x100)
>  #define SPR_USPRG0            (0x100)

Might try to put the DAWR1 enable ahead of this, but if not we'll have
to drop these until that is done. Leave it in for now I'll sort it out
if necessary.

> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c
> index 3cc704adda..39d0c087f1 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static target_ulong h_copy_tofrom_guest(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>  static void nested_save_state(struct nested_ppc_state *save, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>  {
>      CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> +    SpaprMachineState *spapr = SPAPR_MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());

I hope that won't be a big overhead... nested entry/exit performance probably
isn't top priority at the moment though, so for now okay. Should be
something to look at though.


>      memcpy(save->gpr, env->gpr, sizeof(save->gpr));
>  
> @@ -127,6 +128,58 @@ static void nested_save_state(struct nested_ppc_state *save, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>      save->pidr = env->spr[SPR_BOOKS_PID];
>      save->ppr = env->spr[SPR_PPR];
>  
> +    if (spapr_nested_api(spapr) == NESTED_API_PAPR) {
> +        save->pvr = env->spr[SPR_PVR];
> +        save->amor = env->spr[SPR_AMOR];
> +        save->dawr0 = env->spr[SPR_DAWR0];
> +        save->dawrx0 = env->spr[SPR_DAWRX0];
> +        save->ciabr = env->spr[SPR_CIABR];
> +        save->purr = env->spr[SPR_PURR];
> +        save->spurr = env->spr[SPR_SPURR];
> +        save->ic = env->spr[SPR_IC];
> +        save->vtb = env->spr[SPR_VTB];
> +        save->hdar = env->spr[SPR_HDAR];
> +        save->hdsisr = env->spr[SPR_HDSISR];
> +        save->heir = env->spr[SPR_HEIR];
> +        save->asdr = env->spr[SPR_ASDR];
> +        save->dawr1 = env->spr[SPR_DAWR1];
> +        save->dawrx1 = env->spr[SPR_DAWRX1];
> +        save->dexcr = env->spr[SPR_DEXCR];
> +        save->hdexcr = env->spr[SPR_HDEXCR];
> +        save->hashkeyr = env->spr[SPR_HASHKEYR];
> +        save->hashpkeyr = env->spr[SPR_HASHPKEYR];
> +        memcpy(save->vsr, env->vsr, sizeof(save->vsr));
> +        save->ebbhr = env->spr[SPR_EBBHR];
> +        save->tar = env->spr[SPR_TAR];
> +        save->ebbrr = env->spr[SPR_EBBRR];
> +        save->bescr = env->spr[SPR_BESCR];
> +        save->iamr = env->spr[SPR_IAMR];
> +        save->amr = env->spr[SPR_AMR];
> +        save->uamor = env->spr[SPR_UAMOR];
> +        save->dscr = env->spr[SPR_DSCR];
> +        save->fscr = env->spr[SPR_FSCR];
> +        save->pspb = env->spr[SPR_PSPB];
> +        save->ctrl = env->spr[SPR_CTRL];
> +        save->vrsave = env->spr[SPR_VRSAVE];
> +        save->dar = env->spr[SPR_DAR];
> +        save->dsisr = env->spr[SPR_DSISR];
> +        save->pmc1 = env->spr[SPR_POWER_PMC1];
> +        save->pmc2 = env->spr[SPR_POWER_PMC2];
> +        save->pmc3 = env->spr[SPR_POWER_PMC3];
> +        save->pmc4 = env->spr[SPR_POWER_PMC4];
> +        save->pmc5 = env->spr[SPR_POWER_PMC5];
> +        save->pmc6 = env->spr[SPR_POWER_PMC6];
> +        save->mmcr0 = env->spr[SPR_POWER_MMCR0];
> +        save->mmcr1 = env->spr[SPR_POWER_MMCR1];
> +        save->mmcr2 = env->spr[SPR_POWER_MMCR2];
> +        save->mmcra = env->spr[SPR_POWER_MMCRA];
> +        save->sdar = env->spr[SPR_POWER_SDAR];
> +        save->siar = env->spr[SPR_POWER_SIAR];
> +        save->sier = env->spr[SPR_POWER_SIER];
> +        save->vscr = ppc_get_vscr(env);
> +        save->fpscr = env->fpscr;
> +    }
> +
>      save->tb_offset = env->tb_env->tb_offset;
>  }
>  
> @@ -134,6 +187,7 @@ static void nested_load_state(PowerPCCPU *cpu, struct nested_ppc_state *load)
>  {
>      CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
>      CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> +    SpaprMachineState *spapr = SPAPR_MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>  
>      memcpy(env->gpr, load->gpr, sizeof(env->gpr));
>  
> @@ -160,6 +214,58 @@ static void nested_load_state(PowerPCCPU *cpu, struct nested_ppc_state *load)
>      env->spr[SPR_BOOKS_PID] = load->pidr;
>      env->spr[SPR_PPR] = load->ppr;
>  
> +    if (spapr_nested_api(spapr) == NESTED_API_PAPR) {
> +        env->spr[SPR_PVR] = load->pvr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_AMOR] = load->amor;
> +        env->spr[SPR_DAWR0] = load->dawr0;
> +        env->spr[SPR_DAWRX0] = load->dawrx0;
> +        env->spr[SPR_CIABR] = load->ciabr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_PURR] = load->purr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_SPURR] = load->purr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_IC] = load->ic;
> +        env->spr[SPR_VTB] = load->vtb;
> +        env->spr[SPR_HDAR] = load->hdar;
> +        env->spr[SPR_HDSISR] = load->hdsisr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_HEIR] = load->heir;
> +        env->spr[SPR_ASDR] = load->asdr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_DAWR1] = load->dawr1;
> +        env->spr[SPR_DAWRX1] = load->dawrx1;
> +        env->spr[SPR_DEXCR] = load->dexcr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_HDEXCR] = load->hdexcr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_HASHKEYR] = load->hashkeyr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_HASHPKEYR] = load->hashpkeyr;
> +        memcpy(env->vsr, load->vsr, sizeof(env->vsr));
> +        env->spr[SPR_EBBHR] = load->ebbhr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_TAR] = load->tar;
> +        env->spr[SPR_EBBRR] = load->ebbrr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_BESCR] = load->bescr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_IAMR] = load->iamr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_AMR] = load->amr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_UAMOR] = load->uamor;
> +        env->spr[SPR_DSCR] = load->dscr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_FSCR] = load->fscr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_PSPB] = load->pspb;
> +        env->spr[SPR_CTRL] = load->ctrl;
> +        env->spr[SPR_VRSAVE] = load->vrsave;
> +        env->spr[SPR_DAR] = load->dar;
> +        env->spr[SPR_DSISR] = load->dsisr;
> +        env->spr[SPR_POWER_PMC1] = load->pmc1;
> +        env->spr[SPR_POWER_PMC2] = load->pmc2;
> +        env->spr[SPR_POWER_PMC3] = load->pmc3;
> +        env->spr[SPR_POWER_PMC4] = load->pmc4;
> +        env->spr[SPR_POWER_PMC5] = load->pmc5;
> +        env->spr[SPR_POWER_PMC6] = load->pmc6;
> +        env->spr[SPR_POWER_MMCR0] = load->mmcr0;
> +        env->spr[SPR_POWER_MMCR1] = load->mmcr1;
> +        env->spr[SPR_POWER_MMCR2] = load->mmcr2;
> +        env->spr[SPR_POWER_MMCRA] = load->mmcra;

I worry that some other SPRs have "behaviour" we need
to handle. DAWR and MMCR? for example set breakpoints
and PMU beahviour. I don't know how well that is handled
here.

Thanks,
Nick


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-27 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-20  8:35 [PATCH v4 00/15] Nested PAPR API (KVM on PowerVM) Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-20  8:35 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] spapr: nested: register nested-hv api hcalls only for cap-nested-hv Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-27  8:51   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-20  8:35 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] spapr: nested: move nested part of spapr_get_pate into spapr_nested.c Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-20  8:35 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] spapr: nested: Introduce SpaprMachineStateNested to store related info Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-20  8:35 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] spapr: nested: keep nested-hv related code restricted to its API Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-27  8:54   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-27  9:45     ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-27 10:40       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-20  8:35 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] spapr: nested: Document Nested PAPR API Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-27  9:29   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-27  9:31     ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-27 10:39       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-29  5:46         ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-20  8:36 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] spapr: nested: Introduce H_GUEST_[GET|SET]_CAPABILITIES hcalls Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-20  8:36 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] spapr: nested: Introduce H_GUEST_[CREATE|DELETE] hcalls Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-20  8:36 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] spapr: nested: Introduce H_GUEST_CREATE_VCPU hcall Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-27  9:51   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-29  9:39     ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-20  8:36 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] spapr: nested: Extend nested_ppc_state for nested PAPR API Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-27  9:59   ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2024-02-29  9:42     ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-20  8:36 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] spapr: nested: Initialize the GSB elements lookup table Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-27 10:02   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-29 10:29     ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-20  8:36 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] spapr: nested: Introduce H_GUEST_[GET|SET]_STATE hcalls Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-27 10:10   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-03-05  8:19     ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-20  8:36 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] spapr: nested: Use correct source for parttbl info for nested PAPR API Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-27 10:16   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-03-05  8:21     ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-20  8:36 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] spapr: nested: Introduce H_GUEST_RUN_VCPU hcall Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-20  8:36 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] spapr: nested: Introduce cap-nested-papr for Nested PAPR API Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-27 10:22   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-03-05  8:24     ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-20  8:36 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] spapr: nested: Set the PCR when logical PVR is set Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-02-27 10:23   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-03-05  8:26     ` Harsh Prateek Bora

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CZFRUDQEDISV.EXR9E2TZQDP4@wheely \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=amachhiw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=clegoate@redhat.com \
    --cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
    --cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sbhat@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).